No it does not.
Class is an amorphous distinction.
Quite malleable and fluid…easy to reject…OK to discuss.
No it does not.
Class is an amorphous distinction.
Quite malleable and fluid…easy to reject…OK to discuss.
So there is class… thank you.
Like I said…You are in a class all by yourself.
Of course classes are malleable and fluid, they exist though no matter how subjective
No such thing, people rise and fall into and out of the wealthy class routinely. If it was an actual class instead of people succeeding or not, that wouldn’t happen.
Like I said…You are in a class all by yourself.
I am middle class.
So does Santa Claus for the right class.
Like I said…You are in a class all by yourself.
Silliness to take away from an epic face plant for intellectual internet points
So does Santa Claus for the right class.
Well no. That’s an individual.
Silliness
…is a very good way to characterize discussions of class.
Jezcoe: Camp:Present you argument. I am not doing a Q&A.
The claim is made that the US used to be a classless society.
This is demonstrably false as in it is counter to actual history.
You yourself can reject the idea of class… you know who doesn’t?
The upper class.
No such thing, people rise and fall into and out of the wealthy class routinely. If it was an actual class instead of people succeeding or not, that wouldn’t happen.
There is such a thing as entrenched wealth and then using that wealth to continue class conflict.
Camp:Like I said…You are in a class all by yourself.
I am middle class.
American dreamz is a bad movie but for some reason i can get enough of it but a great quote
“Everyone in America thinks they’re middle class. So they like to have someone to look down on.”
FreeAndClear:Silliness
…is a very good way to characterize discussions of class.
While at the same time belittling how members of a class that you define act? Silliness
continue class conflict.
I say INSTIGATE class conflict…ala Marxist doctrine.
Only a crazy silver spoon would want to stir the pot…IMO.
Jezcoe:continue class conflict.
I say INSTIGATE class conflict…ala Marxist doctrine.
Only a crazy silver spoon would want to stir the pot…IMO.
That has to be a joke. Did you just use the term silver spoon after bringing up instigation of class conflict ala Marxist doctrine
Jezcoe:continue class conflict.
I say INSTIGATE class conflict…ala Marxist doctrine.
Only a crazy silver spoon would want to stir the pot…IMO.
Nope. It doesn’t take “Marxist doctrine” to understand class conflict.
Look into the Liberty Men and the Great Proprietors sometime.
zantax: Jezcoe: Camp:Present you argument. I am not doing a Q&A.
The claim is made that the US used to be a classless society.
This is demonstrably false as in it is counter to actual history.
You yourself can reject the idea of class… you know who doesn’t?
The upper class.
No such thing, people rise and fall into and out of the wealthy class routinely. If it was an actual class instead of people succeeding or not, that wouldn’t happen.
There is such a thing as entrenched wealth and then using that wealth to continue class conflict.
No there isn’t. There are income levels and wealth levels, there are no classes. Other than using the term as a descriptive for people who fall into various economic ranges. But that is fluid and has not much to do with what economic class you were born into.
Jezcoe: zantax: Jezcoe: Camp:Present you argument. I am not doing a Q&A.
The claim is made that the US used to be a classless society.
This is demonstrably false as in it is counter to actual history.
You yourself can reject the idea of class… you know who doesn’t?
The upper class.
No such thing, people rise and fall into and out of the wealthy class routinely. If it was an actual class instead of people succeeding or not, that wouldn’t happen.
There is such a thing as entrenched wealth and then using that wealth to continue class conflict.
No there isn’t. There are income levels and wealth levels, there are no classes. Other than using the term as a descriptive for people who fall into various economic ranges. But that is fluid and has not much to do with what economic class you were born into.
So… say someone is from the Rockefeller family.
Simply wealth or class?
zantax: Jezcoe: zantax: Jezcoe: Camp:Present you argument. I am not doing a Q&A.
The claim is made that the US used to be a classless society.
This is demonstrably false as in it is counter to actual history.
You yourself can reject the idea of class… you know who doesn’t?
The upper class.
No such thing, people rise and fall into and out of the wealthy class routinely. If it was an actual class instead of people succeeding or not, that wouldn’t happen.
There is such a thing as entrenched wealth and then using that wealth to continue class conflict.
No there isn’t. There are income levels and wealth levels, there are no classes. Other than using the term as a descriptive for people who fall into various economic ranges. But that is fluid and has not much to do with what economic class you were born into.
So… say someone is from the Rockefeller family.
Simply wealth or class?
Wealth, if they lose their money, they will be poor again, their name won’t save them.
Wealth, if they lose their money, they will be poor again, their name won’t save them.
They will never be poor