No tax on overtime

Well if that’s the case then the government isn’t collecting any significant tax on it in the first place.

  • Before the Trump plan: Government collects 15% of something so small it is very very close to zero. (15% of almost zero is zero.)
  • After the Trump plan, no loss of revenue. it was almost zero to begin with.

For some companies (a McDonald’s franchise) it won’t matter. Their business model is structured such that they don’t need overtime. They just hire another part-timer.

But what about UPS. They have an expensive van for every driver expensive real estate and conveyer belts for every sorter. If they can make their capital stock 10% more efficient that is like reducing interest rates from 4% to 3.6% and THAT is not small potatoes.

Punishment for being bad stewards.

our military is comparatively small, it just has huge firepower

taxing overtime is the governments primary revenue stream? who knew

1 Like

Drill baby drill, using our energy superiority to bring in the $$.
Tariffs and more fair trade with foreign countries brings in $$
USA Manufacturing & exports, bring in $$
Jobs, will bring in more tax revenue $$

When we have record billions/trillions of $$$ coming into the Government from more sources than just taxes, we can pay down the debt. This is a concept that was turned into reality during Trump’s Administration.

No it was not because he nearly doubled the debt from the previous admin and increased the deficit and all before covid

But the dream like fantasy of a period of time through which we all lived is now enshrined in true believers minds

1 Like

:rofl:

Cutting a lot of small stuff adds up to big amounts of money.

The average lib however wants to increase giveaway programs.

More money away from hard working taxpayers and into their own pockets.

1 Like

I am willing to bet any amount of money that if Trump wins, when it comes to election 2028, overtime will still be taxed.

What goes around comes around.

It’s fine for you to do, but you get triggered when someone does it to you:

1 Like

Because we spend more than we take in.

They push for more spending.

PS: Libs DID cut the taxes. Reagan didn’t cut the taxes. Congress did.

1 Like

Maybe your cat typed that.

1 Like

You can call it a case of a blind squirrel finding a nut if you want to, but this would be a REALLY good policy to enact.

1 Like

and we haven’t had a balanced budget since Gingrich/Kasich

That depends on congress.

1 Like

FB_IMG_1726102137414

That 600 ship navy (its normally allocated at 320 ships) wasn’t going to pay for itself.

We had a Soviet Union to bankrupt dammit.

1 Like

As the economy becomes more automated, a policy like this becomes more necessary.

The old model

  • punish labor productivity with 2x FICA tax
  • punish it again with federal income tax
  • punish it again with state & local income taxes

Was conceived and written a century ago when technology was in its infancy (no containerized cargo and more horses than trucks.)

American manufacturing and supply chains need a policy like this and it woukd seriously enrich the working class.

1 Like

The poster responded as if I claimed he said something. I was pointing out my response was not to him.