GWH:
Democrats to announce abuse of power, obstruction of Congress articles of impeachment against Trump
Democrats are expected to go forward with two articles of impeachment this morning, abuse of power and obstruction of congress. Abuse of power because he shouldn’t have gotten power in the first place, it was her turn!
So they’ve backed off bribery, admitting by their own actions that there was no quid pro quo. The testimony thus far hasn’t given them the evidence they needed to proceed with articles describing such. Should this tripe even head to the senate?
The charges are weak weak weak and the public sees right through it.
WuWei:
Debunked” by whom?
There is no DNC server, with all of the answers to exonerate Russia, in Ukraine.
There is no DNC server, with all of the answers to exonerate Russia, in Ukraine.
There is no DNC server, with all of the answers to exonerate Russia, in Ukraine.
PurpnGold:
thinkingman:
WHAT is compelling and overwhelming?
i know i know… “already answered”
i guess we just wont bother with her lie about “bipartisan” but i understand she has an election to overthrow.
Trump was the key player on a scheme to get a foreign government to announce an investigation into his political rival and son, both US citizens. In order to do so, he directed that Ukraine would not get a meeting or Congress approved Military aid until those demands were met. The funds ended up being release once they got caught.
That is why he will be impeached. Any questions?
P.S. as a side note, although this in itself would not be impeachable, he also asked Ukraine to investigate 2 conspiracies. One that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in our election. Two that Crowdstrike stored a “magic server” over in Ukraine.
Both window licking stupid.
I bet Always-Trumper will respond to your thoughtful post with a “so what?”, “you still haven’t shown us he did anything wrong” or some silly meme.
No it isn’t…
What if Obama held up aid to Israel in order to get Netanyahu to announce an investigation into Donald Trump during the 2016 election?
Would you say Obama was abusing his power for political gain?
What if he did the same thing in 2012 to Romney?
Would you say he was abusing his power for personal political gain?
Covfefe
December 10, 2019, 2:39pm
125
Historically this impeachment carries the best evidence of obvious overwhelming malfeasance. If the democrats did not impeach, they would tacitly allow a president to pressure foreign governments to interfere with US elections to investigate political enemies. That cannot stand- not just for democrats or republicans- but for the fabric of our nation. This is a marker for future generations with a clear delineation of right and wrong.
4 Likes
You think that will be the end result of this insanity?
PurpnGold:
No it isn’t…
What if Obama held up aid to Israel in order to get Netanyahu to announce an investigation into Donald Trump during the 2016 election?
Would you say Obama was abusing his power for political gain?
What if he did the same thing in 2012 to Romney?
Would you say he was abusing his power for personal political gain?
Remember when terms like “usurper” and “antichrist” were bandied about to whip the faithful into a frenzy?
Pepperidge Farm remembers. Can’t imagine how they’d shriek if Obama had withheld aid to Israel until they helped find some dirt on Romney.
2 Likes
Blackwolf:
Remember when terms like “usurper” and “antichrist” were bandied about to whip the faithful into a frenzy?
Pepperidge Farm remembers. Can’t imagine how they’d shriek if Obama had withheld aid to Israel until they helped find some dirt on Romney.
Or we could just recall the shrieking about Obama not going to war with Russia over the annexation of Crimea.
2 Likes
WuWei
December 10, 2019, 3:00pm
130
PurpnGold:
WuWei:
Debunked” by whom?
There is no DNC server, with all of the answers to exonerate Russia, in Ukraine.
There is no DNC server, with all of the answers to exonerate Russia, in Ukraine.
There is no DNC server, with all of the answers to exonerate Russia, in Ukraine.
Do you understand that “Russia did it!” is an estimate, not a fact?
PurpnGold:
thinkingman:
WHAT is compelling and overwhelming?
i know i know… “already answered”
i guess we just wont bother with her lie about “bipartisan” but i understand she has an election to overthrow.
Trump was the key player on a scheme to get a foreign government to announce an investigation into his political rival and son, both US citizens. In order to do so, he directed that Ukraine would not get a meeting or Congress approved Military aid until those demands were met. The funds ended up being release once they got caught.
That is why he will be impeached. Any questions?
P.S. as a side note, although this in itself would not be impeachable, he also asked Ukraine to investigate 2 conspiracies. One that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in our election. Two that Crowdstrike stored a “magic server” over in Ukraine.
Both window licking stupid.
this is just simply not true. no aid was tied to doing any investigation or pending any demands. this is a narrative based on the timing. there is no proof
im glad you realize at least that it is not impeachable
but i understand theres an election to overturn. and “he’s racist”, probably huh?
1 Like
DougBH
December 10, 2019, 3:12pm
133
No, I will wait until someone actually shows where all these things were debunked, instead of just saying debunked.
This post is completely inaccurate. The Mueller report laid out the overwhelming evidence proving these facts. Not estimates, facts.
Cynic
December 10, 2019, 3:20pm
135
That’s kind of what the obstruction is about…
GWH
December 10, 2019, 3:23pm
136
Was Trump Bush’s VP prior to Obama’s presidency?
GWH
December 10, 2019, 3:25pm
137
They don’t understand that the Ukraine interfered and has interfered in our elections too.
2 Likes
DougBH:
No, I will wait until someone actually shows where all these things were debunked, instead of just saying debunked.
they of course play the same tired game.
“everything’s been answered/debunked” but they never point to where
Camp
December 10, 2019, 3:28pm
139
The quid Pro Quo has been debunked.
That is fun to say.
This Presidency has been debunked.
