New York Times Changes Headlines when Democrats Complain

[SeaManatee]

@Smyrna

@Sknyluv

So you seem to agree with me. It’s like a for-profit company listened to its customers and reacted accordingly.

“Accordingly” regarding a newpaper should always be, to tell the truth. Wouldn’t you agree? Their mistakes happen too often and are consistently biased in one direction, to conclude it isn’t intentional

5 Biggest Screw-Ups by The New York Times So Far This Year

Was the old title false?
Was the new title false?
Was the article true with the old title?
Was the article true with the new title?

This is a conversation among people that think the New York Times is fake news, so what’s the point?

[zonulet]

@conan

NYSlime been democrat operative/propagandist for last 30 years or more. They gave up their objectionably back when Clinton was pres.

Wonder if they are still bragging about getting Castro in power.

[markdido]

@Sknyluv

@DougBH

And top Democrats are the NYTs customers. They didn’t want a favorable headline for Trump, they wanted a negative headline and the NYTs complied to make them happy.
I never said it was illegal. We just need to know what the NYTs is and who they represent.

So you seem to agree with me. It’s like a for-profit company listened to its customers and reacted accordingly.

If their headlines and news stories are massaged to appease their “customers”, instead of reporting the facts, they shouldn’t enjoy First Amendment protections.

[DougBH]

@markdido

@Sknyluv

@DougBH

And top Democrats are the NYTs customers. They didn’t want a favorable headline for Trump, they wanted a negative headline and the NYTs complied to make them happy.
I never said it was illegal. We just need to know what the NYTs is and who they represent.

So you seem to agree with me. It’s like a for-profit company listened to its customers and reacted accordingly.

If their headlines and news stories are massaged to appease their “customers”, instead of reporting the facts, they shouldn’t enjoy First Amendment protections.

Of course they should. The first amendment protects people to say fake things as well as true things. Bias things as well as neutral things.

[zonulet]

@DougBH

So the NYTs changes their news because Democrat leaders say so and the response is…Trump…Fox.
About right.

They are simply engaging in word repurposing.

[Sknyluv]

@markdido

If their headlines and news stories are massaged to appease their “customers”, instead of reporting the facts, they shouldn’t enjoy First Amendment protections.

What do you think headlines are supposed to do?