This basically tells you everything you already knew about the NYTs. They had an article titled "Trump urges unity vs. racism.” Naturally, the top Democrats didn’t want an article out there showing Trump as being against racism, so they complained to the NYTs.
“Amid a storm of criticism on social media, including from top Democratic presidential candidates, the newspaper later altered it to the more critical: “Assailing hate but not guns.””
Now, if Trump could call up Fox News and tell them to change their news headlines to be more favorable to himself, what would Democrats say about that proving Fox was an extension of the Republican Party? Well, I don’t think Fox would do that, but we now know the NYTs would, when Democrats give the order.
It’s also hilarious to think that Trump would ask to headline to change considering who is running his press office…it’s much more likely where the headline was formed in the first place
We had Tucker on his show saying white supremacy is a hoax like the Russia stuff. Does it matter if it came from Trump or that’s his actual take when it’s the same result?
And the problem with the nyt headline is that anyone ever thought that was a good idea to begin with, it was the van jones today Donald trump became president of headlines. Yes, trump said unity. You don’t make news headlines based on TelePrompter trump. They should know this and it’s why the media is complicit in Trumps game.
The headline is the most important part of an article to many people. It is certainly part of it. Why do you think Democrats thought it so important to change?
