Actually it’s a very good analogy.
Did the NY corporate doctor knowingly ship an illegal substance to Louisiana via her corporate website?
If yes then she knowingly broke the law.
Actually it’s a very good analogy.
Did the NY corporate doctor knowingly ship an illegal substance to Louisiana via her corporate website?
If yes then she knowingly broke the law.
RTchoke:
Well, lets add that the pills were prescribed and mailed to the mother who then gave them to her daughter.
Since when are libs OK with that kind of work around in regards to prescription drugs? Can we do that with all prescription drugs?
So, are you, or are you not, in favor of the patent making medical decisions for the children? You can’t have it both ways.
Was this a medical decision? Or a socio-economic decision?
I think we need to go after the manufacturers.
I think we need to go after the manufacturers.
Well, they know their product is being used in unlawful ways…seems as valid a point as certain other gripes.
WuWei:
I think we need to go after the manufacturers.
Well, they know their product is being used in unlawful ways…seems as valid a point as certain other gripes.
BTW I don’t know if it changes anything
but the corporate doctor who makes her money selling abortion pills to “patients” without seeing them was in this case knowingly sending the pills (plural) to the mother of the teenage patient.
The case appears to mark the first time a provider has faced criminal charges for mailing the medication.
I don’t think this ends well for the doctor or the NY shield law.
Hmmm…that puts the mom in more jeopardy than the out of state doctor. I can’t read the article. Did she get charged too?
Fear not, it seems all the bad actors are getting their just reward:
“An indictment was also issued against the teenager’s mother.”
The case appears to mark the first time a provider has faced criminal charges for mailing the medication.
I love this little gem:
“In a statement, New York Attorney General Letitia James said the criminal charges against Dr Carpenter were a “cowardly attempt” to “weaponize the law against out-of-state providers”.”
Steel-W0LF:
Guess what happens if Portland ships weed to a state it’s not legal?
comparing Mifepristone (an FDA approved drug) and weed (a federal schedule 1 substance is not a good analogy.
try again.
Allan
It got real inconvenient for you real quick.
And now you’re struggling.
FDA approved drug? Epidiolex.
Then you had to jump over “fEdErAl ScHeDuLe”
Is this a federal case?
You are so dependent on central government you’ve made yourself helpless.
Mifepristone-legal in NY. Illegal in Louisiana.
Marijuana-legal in Colorado. Illegal in Louisiana.
It is an excellent analogy.
can a legal licensed doctor from prescribe legal illegal medicines via telemedicine without fear of arrest.
now that we have telemedicine. there is little regulation of the practice.
That’s not true.
Can a state ban a drug that the FDA has found safe?
California might know.
WuWei:
Is Margaret Carpenter licensed to practice medicine in Louisiana?
lol.Doesnt matter. is in NY where the medicine was prescribed.
dont you know how telemedicine works.
Allan
Brilliant!
It’s just another routine embarrassment of a lib tantrum.
I love this little gem:
“In a statement, New York Attorney General Letitia James said the criminal charges against Dr Carpenter were a “cowardly attempt” to “weaponize the law against out-of-state providers”.”
We learned it from you, Fat Leti.
I think we need to go after the manufacturers.
Shhh, that’s only for guns.
Shhh, that’s only for guns.
We can fix that.
This is also a conspiracy.
A Seditious Conspiracy under 18 U.S. Code § 2384.
People were foolish enough to believe that abortion would cease to be a national issue after Dobbs.