New York doctor indicted by a grand jury in Louisiana

for the heinous crime of prescribing a legal drug.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/31/abortion-doctor-indictment-criminal-louisiana-new-york/

“Louisiana prosecutors accuse Margaret Carpenter, 55, of affecting a criminal abortion by means of abortion-inducing drugs. They also indicted her company, Nightingale Medical. Carpenter faces one to five years in prison and a $5,000 to $50,000 fine if convicted of violating a 2022 Louisiana law that bans abortion.“

new york has shield laws against this kind of ■■■■■

doctors are allowed to prescribe legal drugs to patients
without fear of being indicted by a backwards state such as Louisiana.

cant see how this can be allowed to happen.

its a disgrace.

Allan

1 Like

New York declares people felons for paying for non-disclosure statements with intent to do any of several things that the jury doesn’t agree upon.
Tough that you don’t like Louisiana laws.

10 Likes

Well I guess she won’t be going to Mardi Gras any time soon…oh well…

“My girlfriend can’t have an abortion and that makes me sad because responsibility is hard!”

3 Likes

Paywall.

Did the girl go to New York for the pills, or did the Dr ship them to a state where they were illegal?

Guess what happens if Portland ships weed to a state it’s not legal?

7 Likes

Shipped.

Shield law and being wanted for a felony scenarios in the article sound messy.

1 Like

If NY tries to refuse extradition, Louisiana has the option of enforcing it through federal courts.

1 Like

comparing Mifepristone (an FDA approved drug) and weed (a federal schedule 1 substance is not a good analogy.

try again.

Allan

hence it becomes a federal matter to be decided by courts.

are new york shield laws sufficient protecting doctors from the law
of louisiana.

now that we have telemedicine. there is little regulation of the practice.

can a legal licensed doctor from prescribe legal medicines via telemedicine without fear of arrest.

Allan

Who are you talking about?

It wasn’t Trump. Trump was convicted of felonious falsification of business records for laundering money through his business to hide another crime (in this case Cohen’s). He wasn’t convicted for having an NDA.

WW

Nope. There were three permisable purposes and the jury didn’t have to agree on which one applied.
Money laundering is when you hide money that was earned illegally. That has nothing to do,with the case. NDAs are legal.

5 Likes

Correct. The jury had to be unamimous (100%) that Trump committed the conspiracy and actual business fraud. The jury IS NOT REQUIRED to agree as to the motivation for the crime.

If a husband murders his wife, the jury does not have to agree that the motive for the murder was (a) she was having an affair with the pool girl, or (b) he wanted the $5,000,000 insurance payout. They just have to agree on the crime, not the motive.

Correct. The money was laundered through the business because as part of the fraud and conspiracy (a) it was not a business expense, (b) false invoices were submitted for a retainer that didn’t exist and for services that were not performed, (c) the payments were not for reimbursement of expenses, they were billed as services (income).

Of course NDA’s are legal. And if they had conducted the legal affairs legally there would have been no crimes.

Cohen and Trump WERE NOT charged with having an NDA, they were charged with Federal Campaign Fraud (Cohen) and State Falsification of Business Records (Trump) because they paid for the NDA in an illegal manner.

WW

Two problems that Louisiana is going to face in trying to get a Federal Court to extradite:

  1. Louisiana is not a party to the interstate extradition compact;

  2. extradition interstate only applies to “fugitives,” which this Doctor is not because she has not fled the jurisdiction of the “demanding” state.

2 Likes

Is Margaret Carpenter licensed to practice medicine in Louisiana?

3 Likes

She broke the law, and THAT’S why she’s in trouble? Imagine that!

4 Likes

Can a state ban a drug that the FDA has found safe? Federal preemption would seem to say no. But what if the sole purpose of that drug is to perform an act (abortion) that the Supreme Court has ruled is under state control?
I’m not sure there is a clear answer till the court rules.

1 Like

was the doctor charged federally? no. perfect analogy.

2 Likes

uhm… no. That’s not even possible.

Trump was charged with making false entries (that were not false) in a business ledger (that was not a business ledger) to cover up a state campaign crime that could not possibly have been a crime when the entries were made.

4 Likes

This is the key question.

2 Likes