Does it? Cool
which party did this staggering (oddly familiar amount) amount benefit?
which party did this staggering (oddly familiar amount) amount benefit?
It was the Democratic primary.
Itās in the title of the thread.
except of course its not. you are free to read into it whatever you wish, iāll take it face value.
Good for you, donāt believe your lying ears.
But for the record, that was a blatant and open solicitation of election fraud. On tape, for the whole world to hear.
But why accede to reality, when conspiracy theory is so much more fun, right?
the only lying going on hear is somewhere between your ears and your brain where a lot of meaning is being added to plain words that already have a meaning. find means find, as in if you look for them they are there, since it is not possible to find anything thatās not there, the fact that you wish to make find mean fabricate does not make it mean fabricate.
kinda hard to prove voter fraud if you insist it didnāt happen and refuse to look. investigating for fraud would not overturn an election, it would stop one from being overturned by fraud or (more likely) reaffirm the outcome.
Are you under the impression that there havenāt been plenty of voter fraud investigations in the past?
Considering Trumpās history, Iām amazed that people still give him the benefit of the doubt but each to their own.
what does that have to do with 2020?
ah interesting
what does that have to do with 2020?
Investigate away, Quixote! Give me a call when you have something.
fairly certain iāve been consistant in saying whatever is found wonāt matter to the result.
the only lying going on hear is somewhere between your ears and your brain where a lot of meaning is being added to plain words that already have a meaning. find means find, as in if you look for them they are there, since it is not possible to find anything thatās not there, the fact that you wish to make find mean fabricate does not make it mean fabricate.
Yes. He very plainly says āfind me votesā. A naked solicitation if election fraud. I am glad we can agreeš
Now your making things up. He very plainly did not say find me votes.
Now your making things up. He very plainly did not say find me votes.
You are right. He said:
āAll I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have, because we won the stateā
Direct quote. Thereās audio.
If one extrapolated that reasoning for other elections, it would mean that every single Senate and House of Reps election result should be audited for voter fraud as well.
did i say otherwise?
all firms are inexperienced before they get experience
Would you like them to start gaining experience in something a wee bit easier, say a mayors races with 20,000:votes rather than a presidential one with 2,100,000 ones?
Allan
Fortunately these kinds of problems can only ever occur in New York City during Democratic primaries. To suggest otherwise is a threat to democracy and the national election system.
I knooooowā¦rite?
No. I donāt care about your feelings about what Trump said.
Objectively, he said the words āI just want to find 11,780 votesā.
Subjectively, youāve decided to interpret his remarks in an entirely innocent and innocuous way - an interpretation that is (to me) delusional.
Thatās because subjectively youāve decided to interpret his remarks in an entirely sinister way.
You libs donāt seem to realize that when you make charges against conservatives, they apply to you as well.
Is Trump running for mayor of NYC? Whatād I miss?
Neither did Biden. But the reports arenāt telling us that he actually won the mayoral race.