which party did this staggering (oddly familiar amount) amount benefit?
It was the Democratic primary.
Itâs in the title of the thread.
1 Like
Good for you, donât believe your lying ears.
But for the record, that was a blatant and open solicitation of election fraud. On tape, for the whole world to hear.
But why accede to reality, when conspiracy theory is so much more fun, right?
1 Like
the only lying going on hear is somewhere between your ears and your brain where a lot of meaning is being added to plain words that already have a meaning. find means find, as in if you look for them they are there, since it is not possible to find anything thatâs not there, the fact that you wish to make find mean fabricate does not make it mean fabricate.
Are you under the impression that there havenât been plenty of voter fraud investigations in the past?
Considering Trumpâs history, Iâm amazed that people still give him the benefit of the doubt but each to their own.
1 Like
what does that have to do with 2020?
Investigate away, Quixote! Give me a call when you have something.
fairly certain iâve been consistant in saying whatever is found wonât matter to the result.
Yes. He very plainly says âfind me votesâ. A naked solicitation if election fraud. I am glad we can agreeđ
Now your making things up. He very plainly did not say find me votes.
If one extrapolated that reasoning for other elections, it would mean that every single Senate and House of Reps election result should be audited for voter fraud as well.
Would you like them to start gaining experience in something a wee bit easier, say a mayors races with 20,000:votes rather than a presidential one with 2,100,000 ones?
Allan
Guvnah
79
Thatâs because subjectively youâve decided to interpret his remarks in an entirely sinister way. 
You libs donât seem to realize that when you make charges against conservatives, they apply to you as well.
2 Likes
Guvnah
80
Neither did Biden. But the reports arenât telling us that he actually won the mayoral race. 
