The percentage of invalid or disqualified votes in the city primaries would be more than enough to flip several states in a presidential election, yet any real investigations or audits are labeled as threats to democracy.
The only logical explanation for this apparent contradiction is that most media people recognize that New York City Democrats are uniquely stupid and/or incompetent.
see, this is the problem. you’re willing to accept the problems were few because this is what we’re told by the people who are invested in the idea that the problems are few. yet if you call for investigation to ensure the problems are few you’re attacking democracy. so, we have no way of knowing either to be true. if you believe fraud happened and say so, its not an attack on democracy, its a defense of democracy. if you want to investigate suspected fraud its not an attack on democracy, its a defense of democracy. no matter how the investigation ends up, its a defense of democracy. failing to investigate is an attack on democracy. allowing fraud to stand is an attack on democracy. allowing people who have a vested interest in not finding problems to be the arbiters of whether problems exist is an attack on democracy.
trump lost. i have little doubt. fraud did happen, and more than we know, i have little doubt. even without it, he would have still lost, i have little doubt.
Of course. Election mess ups that were caught are proof that the system works. In order to make a case that elections could be at risk, it is necessary to list fraud or errors that have never been caught.