The new TV’s come with free shows from online and such, so cable is in decline. I’m streaming more and more, and watching 80% less cable. I mean you can get YouTube, prime, netflix and tons more options than just passive cable.
Att, charter, direct TV, There’s the new guys who are cheaper because they don’t have ESPN. Lot’s of choice in captialism… Is your service slowing down or something?
Many people live in a monopoly for ISPs. The problem is what happens when your ISP launches its own streaming service and slows down Netflix and Hulu so theyre unwatchable unless each pays them money to access their network at fast speeds?
Or if Comcast, which owns NBC, decides it wants the default news site to be MSNBC and slows down Fox News so its site takes forever to load?
Keeping net neutrality will prevent these scenarios. Destroying it makes them plausible. It would fully give corporations the power to effectively censor the internet, Squash start ups and competition, and dictate what parts of the internet you can access.
Thankfully John Donovan (AT&T Communications CEO) made $12.5 million last year and Randall Stephenson (AT&T CEO) brought home $25.3 million. At least they’ll be able to afford TV and internet. With their employee discount, of course.
I was just going to mention him because he act as if he was the all knowing expert. As an IT guy that know how this process works from a business and technology perspective I gave a little input, but mostly stayed out of the debate. Many didn’t know what NN was and kept regurgitating what they heard or read from any right wing based media outlet that had counter talking points.
And they did $5 billion in stock buybacks while trying to dump their union labor force here in NYC.
I cry a river for Charter everytime they spend $5 billion in the past year to prop the stock up but don’t want to pay labor more and then claim that they have to raise rates