Nope. Again you speaketh with forked tongue. Can you tell me which big tech companies he demanded fork over info about his opponents? And which opponents were they? Who gave the info to Newt?
Itās a constantly repeated pattern.
Here we go again.
BUT TRUMP!!!
This is the worst excuse ever. Both sad and pathetic.
No that is you with the gas lightingā¦ That was not the assertion my post was refuting.
Never in the history of this country has one member of a political party demanded to be given the personal information of her political rivals
That is exactly what Newt did.
Going full Marxist= literally anything (c)Republicans donāt like.
Not true. If thereās a racial aspect, itās CRT.
And also Marxist.
sikofit:Yet you had no problem with the Trump
Here we go again.
BUT TRUMP!!!
This is the worst excuse ever. Both sad and pathetic.
Double standard noted
No that is you with the gas lighting
No. Itās not me. Whiff. Itās your nasty witch demanding that her big tech minions provide her with personal information that is none of her business.
Double standard noted
I donāt give a ā ā ā ā what you note. Note that.
Iāll remember that in 2023.
sikofit:Going full Marxist= literally anything (c)Republicans donāt like.
You speaketh with forked tongue. Nobody has said that. Invented by you. Thus accusation reflects poorly on you. This is a specific case.
So you think that your hag can be trusted with the personal information of her opponents? What the hell has she done to earn that kind of trust?
Again, it isnāt the substance of the calls, it is only who was talking to who. For what was actually said they will need to subpoena the callerā¦
All of which is perfectly reasonable when your theory is that members of congress conspired with Trump on the insurrection.
Not true. If thereās a racial aspect, itās CRT.
Be careful. False mass racial accusations of Hannity viewers can and will get you flagged.
Tread lightly.
Iāll remember that in 2023.
You always have supported Republicans going after Democrats in the past when Republicans have the power so why would the next time be any different
You mean CoJ?
Feel free to point out any accusations I have made, and I will be happy to delete the post.
FreeAndClear:The Republican controlled doj certainly has. Want to try again?
Nope. You are not thinking clearly. This is so basic, you should be embarrassed that you donāt get it. Or maybe you are just being dishonest because youāre okay with it being uses against republicans? Either way it reflects very poorly on you.
Itās the DOJās job to conduct investigations of possible crimes. Never in the history of this country has one member of a political party demanded to be given the personal information of her political rivals. If you donāt get it, youāre in trouble. If you do get it and are okay with it, youāre dangerous to democracy.
Congress has investigative capacity. When you donāt know basic civics you shouldnāt shame others. Truly.
And the rest of your post is not true.
Whitewater.
Personal recordings by a president
Etc.
The hysteria is adorable.
You mean CoJ?
Conan of justiceš
Did Iā¦or was that wanting Trump to do what democrats/Obama had done to give libs a taste of their own medicine.
Did Iā¦or was that wanting Trump to do what democrats/Obama had done to give libs a taste of their own medicine.
Yes. Actively calling for Trump to take a particular action is supporting that action.
Thatās rightā¦to give libs a taste of their own medicine.
Seems you have a problem of republicans doing what libs do to that.