And this makes a difference…how?
If it turns into a criminal investigation, the DOJ.could very well subpoena them later.
The Republican controlled doj certainly has. Want to try again?
Come on, that doesn’t count. Because reasons.
This topic took off like a rocket.
The partisan hacks are getting loopy.
Pelosi is a danger to us all.
Yeah, it’s amazing how the partisan hacks are suddenly concerned with privacy when exposing leakers was all the rage just a couple of years ago.
biggestal99:The ones that will be issued when necessary by the select committee.
Do you think a select committee should be looking at the communications of Swalwell after he was busted for banging a Chinese spy? Or should they simply assume it’s all good? He’s a dem. And dems don’t investigate dems. Am I right?
Swalwell cooperated.
It appears the house is asking for these records to be preserved. It’s unclear if and when they would actually view the records or use them in their investigation.
“The Select Committee seeks the preservation of these records as part of its examination of the violent attack on the Capitol and the broader context of efforts to delay or interfere with the peaceful transfer of power following the 2020 election,” Chairman Bennie Thompson of Mississippi wrote in the letters to the companies …
House asks companies to save Jan. 6 phone, computer records - The Boston Globe
Why would one want them preserved if they are not planning to use them?
You don’t ask this “just in case”, they are planning on using these records for the investigation, and wouldn’t shock me at all if they are also used during the next cycle.
Loopy definitely fits.
Why would one want them preserved if they are not planning to use them?
So that if they decide to use them they are available?
It’s Marxism to ask companies not to destroy records.
Marxism I tell you!
Striker840:Why would one want them preserved if they are not planning to use them?
So that if they decide to use them they are available?
So they ARE planning on using them, IF they show what they want them to show. Got it. So, no factual basis for this request, just a fishing expedition. Got it, so are you ok with this fishing expedition?
Sknyluv: Striker840:Why would one want them preserved if they are not planning to use them?
So that if they decide to use them they are available?
So they ARE planning on using them, IF they show what they want them to show. Got it. So, no factual basis for this request, just a fishing expedition. Got it, so are you ok with this fishing expedition?
We’re you OK with Trump’s DOJ undertaking fishing expeditions to find leakers?
And how will they know what’s in them to be able to decide if they use them…since they won’t be allowed to look at them?
So they ARE planning on using them, IF they show what they want them to show. Got it. So, no factual basis for this request, just a fishing expedition. Got it, so are you ok with this fishing expedition?
They might review the communications if justification is presented. You can’t review something that has been deleted or isn’t available. So therefore, you take steps to preserve potential evidence if justification is presented to review said evidence.
Striker840: Sknyluv: Striker840:Why would one want them preserved if they are not planning to use them?
So that if they decide to use them they are available?
So they ARE planning on using them, IF they show what they want them to show. Got it. So, no factual basis for this request, just a fishing expedition. Got it, so are you ok with this fishing expedition?
We’re you OK with DOJ undertaking fishing expeditions to find leakers?
Nope, unless you have specific information that ties an individual to the leak, OR for Jan 6. The fact that many on the left support this move is cause for concern.
The partisan hacks are getting loopy.
Indeed. Remember when you were totally for Trump doing the same thing to find leakers?
instead there looks to be evidence to go after the leakers this time.
Time to prosecute the people responsible for changing the “whistleblower” rules and to prosecute the leakers.
It’s Marxism to ask companies not to destroy records.
Marxism I tell you!
Bongino daily screams into his microphone that the big tech companies are “commies!”
There in it together!
Two birds of much differing stripes.
I appreciate your keen memory and search skills.
Pelosi does not comprehend how absurd it appears for her to push on like this. I hope nobody tells her.
Two birds of much differing stripes.
Yeah, you’re fine with one side doing it but not the other. Hypocrisy noted
Not at all.
None of the leaks against Trump were factual. They were narrative driven, as is the Pelosi demands here.
There is a new call transcript between Biden and the little crook Ghani that you need to see…from July 23, 2021. The last call.