Yet you’re calling for investigations due solely to claims from a similar film.
Wait, what am I calling for?
You must have me confused with someone else.
zantax: JayJay: zantax: JayJay:China made them work until all hours of the morning at a yearly salary of $18,000?
That’s great pay, for China, much lower cost of living there.
Yeah he could be getting away with paying them $6k.
He’s a saint…a real saint, I tell you.
Pay is relative, monthly cost of living in China is $224, so yeah, it’s great pay, in China.
We’ll probably because when you’re slaving away past 3 AM, you really don’t have a lot of free time.
A real saint, I tell you!
And aren’t we supposed to be encouraging business to get out of China?
Only the businesses owned by liberals
tnt: GWH:It would be funny if his offer to buy was just to see how many accounts were fake, disclose that information, and tank the stock.
I don’t get the joke.
It would also likely be an SEC violation.
How? If Twitter is overvalued through fake accounts, he can back on out. They said 5% fakes, what if it’s a lot more?
The twitter censors don’t speak every language in the world. They speak only English.
I would like to see your evidence of that claim
Wait, what am I calling for?
You must have me confused with someone else.
No you are the one confused. It shows who I replied to in my post and it wasn’t you
Jezcoe: zantax:Yes, they do, anything it’s legal for them to do is also legal for you.
When one has billions in assets they operate in a different reality than the common man.
They have access that no one else does.
To pretend otherwise is silly.
That doesn’t mean they operate under a different legal structure.
What the Panama papers have shown is that they operate under the same legal structure.
Imagine:
- in Germany you will find people who are pro-German but anti-American.
- in the USA and China, and Russia and Saudi Arabia and everywhere else you will find a similar pattern.
Twitter has 7,000 employees.
The twitter censors don’t speak every language in the world. They speak only English.So
- Twitter applies its anti-right definition of “truth” in a disproportionate way,
- This discriminates against pro-american tweets
- It completely fails to screen anti-american tweets even when they lie and/or incite acts of violence.
Sound about right?
Call me crazy but if strippers can manage to use Google Translate to talk to non English speaking customers, thousands of people with master’s degrees can probably do it as well.
Do you really think a company of 7,000 people (most working form home) has a censorhip committee that analyzes tweets in Vietnamese and Baluch and Finnish and Urdu and Farsi and Arabic?
You are not usually so dishonest as to pretend such things Tommy.
Do you really think a company of 7,000 people (most working form home) has a censorhip committee that analyzes tweets in Vietnamese and Baluch and Finnish and Urdu and Farsi and Arabic?
You are not usually so dishonest as to pretend such things Tommy.
What, like pretending they’re working in a 1950s office with file cabinets and a stock ticker instead of with computing power that rivals most actual major nations and the most sophisticated expert systems ever created?
You link to 2000 Mules through D’Souza’s Twitter and he is spending almost the entire time talking about the movie.
He’s not being treated unfairly.
If you wanted to monitor anti-Russian hate speech or anti-
Russian calls to violence on RIGHT NOW in the Ukraine how many Russians speakers would you put on the job?
Please come back to reality.
If you wanted to monitor anti-Russian hate speech or anti-
Russian calls to violence on RIGHT NOW in the Ukraine how many Russians speakers would you put on the job?Please come back to reality.
I would use a translation program like everyone does, including strippers with eighth grade educations, as I pointed out earlier.
but with a trillion bucks.
How much do you have.
Looks like musk is trying to back out?
Why wouldn’t he have verified the accounts before making his offer?
Perhaps the skeptics were right?
Looks like musk is trying to back out?
Why wouldn’t he have verified the accounts before making his offer?
Perhaps the skeptics were right?
This whole farce is now done. Musk said he’d buy but only at a lower price, which violates the agreement in principle he reached with their board. Not that it wasn’t super obvious he would never buy it.
tnt:Looks like musk is trying to back out?
Why wouldn’t he have verified the accounts before making his offer?
Perhaps the skeptics were right?
This whole farce is now done. Musk said he’d buy but only at a lower price, which violates the agreement in principle he reached with their board. Not that it wasn’t super obvious he would never buy it.
Their valuation is directly tied to the number of real users they have, if they are lying about the number of bots it won’t be him that broke the deal, it will be them.
TommyLucchese: tnt:Looks like musk is trying to back out?
Why wouldn’t he have verified the accounts before making his offer?
Perhaps the skeptics were right?
This whole farce is now done. Musk said he’d buy but only at a lower price, which violates the agreement in principle he reached with their board. Not that it wasn’t super obvious he would never buy it.
Their valuation is directly tied to the number of real users they have, if they are lying about the number of bots it won’t be him that broke the deal, it will be them.
Why didn’t he verify this before the offer? How does he know it’s higher? It’s all a stall tactic.
Their valuation is directly tied to the number of real users they have, if they are lying about the number of bots it won’t be him that broke the deal, it will be them.
20% fake accounts, eh?
That’s way higher than 5%.
zantax: TommyLucchese: tnt:Looks like musk is trying to back out?
Why wouldn’t he have verified the accounts before making his offer?
Perhaps the skeptics were right?
This whole farce is now done. Musk said he’d buy but only at a lower price, which violates the agreement in principle he reached with their board. Not that it wasn’t super obvious he would never buy it.
Their valuation is directly tied to the number of real users they have, if they are lying about the number of bots it won’t be him that broke the deal, it will be them.
Why didn’t he verify this before the offer? How does he know it’s higher? It’s all a stall tactic.
My guess is, he suspected they were lying, now he gets a billion if he proves they are. And destroys their stock which he can then acquire for pennies on the dollar.