Wouldn’t be surprised.
Michael Avenatti
The whistleblowers lawyer agrees with you 100%
https://twitter.com/markszaidesq/status/1180857154452021248?s=21
2 Likes
Multiple bankruptcies
Multiple wives
Multiple whistleblowers
Multiple obstruction of justice
Multiple lies
I’m I missing some multiples?
4 Likes
That’s because actual lawyers know more than message board lawyers…
4 Likes
Add multiple infidelities after multiple wives.
I wonder how old that section of the law is?
“Reasonable” 
over and over.
They haven’t figured out “metoo!” yet.
I have no doubt they got 'im now.
I’m wagering the ink is still wet?
Probably not. “Reasonable” has been the new standard for a while now.
The whistle blower laws were just changed by the intelligence community to allow hearsay as a whistle blower.
Proof?
1 Like
The laws weren’t changed.
The wording on a form was, it was under review before the whistleblower came forward and was changed after he’d already filled his form out.
It was changed because it was inaccurate.
2 Likes
It really doesn’t matter.
It’s a misleading talking point that’s been promoted by dishonest pundits.
2 Likes
True perhaps, but irrelevant.
First WB was wrong.
Maybe next 12 will get it right…like all the Kav allegations that were without merit.
Should have just waited for the 2020 vote…forced error on the D part.
What was wrong?
Why would that appear on the form in the first place?
To avoid hearsay and he said she said allegations.
Now we have unsubstantiated allegations…surprise!
