Mueller Warns of Active Russian Meddling


#61

What were you saying in all of those threads?

Did you agree with Romney(at THAT time)?

Damn shame we can’t go back and find out.


#62

We don’t just wish to charge them with crimes. We wish to see them stand trial.


#63

Yep. Sure did. It doesn’t matter who the president is to me. An attack on our democratic process is serious enough that politics shouldn’t play into it… right?


#64

Then evidence will have to be turned over to the defense.


#65

When will they show up to court?


#66

They already have, he charged corporations, corporate lawyers are the appropriate people to show up for that.


#67

We will see what the court decides who needs to show up.


#68

Why don’t you post in invisible ink, it’s what I want.


#69

Who do you think should show up? Shareholders? Long line of precedent involved here, charge a corporation with a crime, you get corporate lawyers, that’s how it works. If you want an individual or individuals to show in court, charge them instead.


#70

Unlike obama who unleashed cyber shock and awe.


#71

And, the 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back, because, the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.

Until Clinton lost.


#72

Yevgeny Prigozhin and Dmitry Utkin


#73

You apparently didn’t pay attention to any events from 2013 on.

Too busy clearing brush and being snarky I’m sure. Time to catch up before you look foolish.


#74


#75

Separate indictments.


#76

Then he definitely needs to show up before any trial.


#77

So you are saying that possibly the US investigators have uncovered a clear and present danger to the republic but are just sitting on the information.


#78

For his trial, yes, which is not the indictment against a corporation.


#79

Nope. For both. He’s a responsible party.


#80

Again, long precedent involved regarding cases against corporations as to who counts as showing up for the trial. Their lawyers count, sorry.