BLM is a domestic terrorist group so to be honest I could give a â â â â what they said.
Thatâs the group that caused a record 2 billion in property damage last year and got 2 or 3 dozen people killed in the process. BLM has raised how much money leaching off of the deaths of black menâŚas long as they died the right way at the hands of a police Officer. BLM was a leading driving force behind the stupid defund the police movement directly contributing to riding crime in major American cities, (especially the ones run by democrats).
BLM in my humble opinion is a RACIST domestic terror group (if you feel the need to put one skin color in your name stop looking youâve found the racists) and I see no reason to believe one word in any statement they have issued.
BLM is an actual 501(c)(3). Its also a societal movement. But If I had my own neighborhood BLM group that doesnât mean Iâm affliated with the official BLM organization.
Itâs unique in that way. I canât really think of another cultural movement that became incorporated like this. It helps them control their message to an extent, but like the case of the OP itâs almost impossible to stop anyone from saying they speak for or represent BLM.
Hereâs a FoxBusiness story from election time a year agoâŚ
â One photo showed the first and second-floor windows of one building boarded up and spray painted to include artwork in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. Wells Fargo, Francescaâs, CVS Pharmacy and Washington Sports Club were among some of the business with plywood protecting their windows.
BLM, much like the Dem party will, at times, criticize people that associate themselves with their cause. BLM decided that this man is someone they should denounce, much like Dems have denounced people in their party for behavior they feel does not represent the party.
The GOP, on the other hand, have decided to embrace abhorrent behavior. Deciding that denouncing almost anyone that associates themselves with the GOP would cost them more than they would gain.