I’m all ears.
The reasoning matters more than the “stuff” when it comes to moral superiority, so no - I don’t believe one philosophy is necessarily superior to another.
Big Gov Prog.
The reasoning matters more than the “stuff” when it comes to moral superiority, so no - I don’t believe one philosophy is necessarily superior to another.
Then why did you choose the one you did?
Big Gov Prog.
Color me unsurprised.
WuWei:Big Gov Prog.
Color me unsurprised.
The Big Gov is your philosophy on the judiciary and the need for order.
Is “America First” as a principle immoral?
The Big Gov is your philosophy on the judiciary and the need for order.
No, not at all. But again, I am not surprised that that’s the conclusion that you would come to.
Is “America First” as a principle immoral?
What is “America First”, as a principle?
WuWei:The Big Gov is your philosophy on the judiciary and the need for order.
No, not at all. But again, I am not surprised that that’s the conclusion that you would come to.
What do you mean “not at all”?
WuWei:Is “America First” as a principle immoral?
What is “America First”, as a principle?
The first consideration when developing policy.
Come on man.
The first consideration when developing policy.
Come on man.
“America First” is a slogan, not a principle.
If you believe in anthropogenic climate change and resource competition, is it moral to have more than one child? More than two children?
WuWei:The first consideration when developing policy.
Come on man.
“America First” is a slogan, not a principle.
No, it is not. Example Canada and drugs.
Example: Should we ship vaccine before we have vaccinated.
Example: Should we import refugees.
What do you mean “not at all”?
I mean that my judicial philosophy has nothing at all to do with the “size” of government - which is itself an utterly meaningless and undefined metric.
No, it is not.
This speaks to my point, as a whole.
The simple fact that we disagree fundementally on what the term means is proof of its lack of sematic value.
WuWei:What do you mean “not at all”?
I mean that my judicial philosophy has nothing at all to do with the “size” of government - which is itself an utterly meaningless and undefined metric.
Size and authority. Do you believe the judiciary has the power to do what it does today?
The more power gov has, the more it must grow to exercise it. Intrusion or imposition if you prefer.
Size and authority. Do you believe the judiciary has the power to do what it does today?
You’ll have to be more specific than that.
WuWei:Size and authority. Do you believe the judiciary has the power to do what it does today?
You’ll have to be more specific than that.
I added to it.
Montana Rifles will do.
Montana Rifles will do.
I don’t know what you are referring to. The rifle company?