Shakespeare teaches itself. All you have to do is read Hamlet or MacBeth, and maybe show a couple of the movies. It is impossible to “teach” that badly.
Romeo and Juliet is probably the most misunderstood play in history because of poor understanding from High School.
I went to a school of Arts for theater for high school…. And the instruction I got in Shakespeare there was light years away from my “normal” high school.
I am behind that if we want children to appreciate arts… first introduce them to the arts that they can relate most closely with and then go back to the foundational canon.
I’ve never thought of it that way. But that’s a really smart way to go about teaching literature.
I’ve always thought that having a decent understanding of foundational canon would go a long way to better appreciating media and art in general.
Starting with relatable media first, and then going back and explaining references, and timeless themes is a great way to teaching “boring” subjects like Shakespeare.
Contemporary art is the most relatable art because it is an expression of the now.
It may be ephemeral and will not last… but an appreciation of it allows for one to go back and see the artistic conversation happen in reverse.
It is easy to teach artistically where we are right now… going back then to the various movements and reactions then makes it more relatable to what we see today.
How about an extensive course on the history of slavery throughout human history? Along with touching on the connecting subjects of philosophy, psycology, sociology, economics and their influences on the practice of slavery?