Exactly. It’s simply transferring one form of health-care insurance for another form of healthcare insurance.
To call it “free health-care” is simply incorrect. And I am also assuming that you have to pay co-pays and surcharges.
I would much rather we “fix” ACA, and then go toward a system which probably be more inefficient.
I get that people shouldn’t be begging on the streets or have to use gofundme just to get medical treatment, but I think the profit factor is a necessary evil.
A private sector employer is responsible for providing at least a minimum wage. How is requiring the employer provide a minimum wage + a certain amount of sick pay per hour worked any different?
Private sector employers are also required to pay the employee while they aren’t producing during their mandatory breaks. I get 20 minutes a day to play on my phone and still get paid.
I’d be interesting is seeing some true cost analysis of single-payer that includes not only the cost of program, but something that balances out those cost with reduced employer costs since employers and employees wouldn’t be paying BOTH single-payer premiums and employee & employer contributions to private health insurance.
Has there been any discussion of catastrophic single-payer? Once that kicks in when medical expenses exceed a certain threashold such as cardiac problems, kidney disease, cancer, severe accident trauma, etc.?
Helluva post Chief. That’s the kind of thing I mean when I say do it right. We can figure it out, what we don’t need is surprises or another garbage program that benefits the wrong people.