LOL… Keep going with your science. This does not prove what your original “scientific” thoughts came up with… Not one bit actually but please do not let me stop you. haha
You are playing semantics. Just because you reject how I worded the statement doesn’t mean that my general premise is true. Are you denying that someone cannot be trained to pass a polygraph?
I have never said that so no why would I deny it or that I even believe in the device. I saw that you started a thread with the word “scientific” in it. That normally means based on facts unlike your statement. Plane and simple
Here is what I said: “Any actor or trained actor can easily pass a polygraph. Furthermore an honest but reserved shy type a person will likely do very poorly on a polygraph test. Polygraphs cannot determine the truth or falsehood in a persons brain. It’s more of a biological test.”
The word scientific never appears. The fact is that people can be trained to pass polygraphs and that has been scientifically tested, are you denying that?
No one I can see claimed otherwise. Only thing I see is Spartacus saying your comment that any actor can pass a poly test is crap. I agree with him, I do not think that Tom Cruse could fool a poly test. He might be once he makes OT-VIII level when his mind if free of theetans and can just change reality.
The answer is obvious. I posted a hypotherical scenario in which Ford speaks to herself. There is no other way that we designate such a hypothetical self talk without quotes.
A rational non-partisan reader without TDS would recognize that the phrase “Ms Ford says to herself” leads to a self-talk that could have never been recorded.