You can’t possibly know that to be true unless you know every possible positive person you’ve come into contact with and how many contacts you’ve had with each of them while they were positive.
Unless you know you’ve come into contact with infected people who were still contagious and the circumstances under which you did you simply have no possible way of knowing how effective your measures are.
Neither do I so by the same standard not giving a damn or worrying about it along with simply going on with my life as normal is 100% effective as well.
The rest of the world media isn’t running the same stories we re in the US or fabricating their number nor over hyping them to get their leaders removed.
Why is 99% Media attention here bad and always blaming the POTUS for problems created by state and local leaders, mostly democrats?
Explain that for us if you want to make that comparison.
Can I guess? It is the fact that an elected member of Congress is not isolating after testing positive for a highly contagious disease that has killed 150,000 Americans in 6 months and is likely spreading it?
No point, its obvious on this forum the slavish following and defence of Trump will continue long after he is out of office.
Though I am interested to know where you got your 99% calculation from? As someone who tells everyone to only rely on facts I am sure a link to a reputable study confirming 99% will be posted shortly.
Hark whats that I hear, the thunderous sound of a keyboard as a frantic google search is undertaken by Trump supporters.
Hmmm, I checked in real time and you posted 4 minutes after me or at least that is what the software said. If you think 6 minutes is the reasonable time for you to read my post, click the link, read the study, and come back here and respond…