1 Like
The way I see it is just two self-serving douchebags. Neither gives a flying ■■■■ about feeding the hungry, both just want the credit.
3 Likes
Nope.
Trump actually sent the food.
1 Like
And what was his motive, you think he actually cares?
Like the Amazon driver putting in a letter.
1 Like
And in violation of the Hatch act.
1 Like
At a cost to taxpayers of sixty to eighty dollars a box for twenty dollars worth of food.
Link?
"First of all, the government paid high prices for the food. “Across the board, I think there were premium prices paid for all of those boxes,” the San Antonio Food Bank’s Cooper said. “Some of these food boxes, they were $40, $50, $60 for what you’d get at a grocery store for about $20.”
…cept one implied they did it and one of them actually did it…amirite? 
Do normal people take credit for someone else’s work?
Oh, wait!
So instead of just giving farmers subsidies, we actually get food in return that is then used to help those in need? Yeah…what a terrible program. Orange man baaa, baaa, baaad…amirite?
So wait… are you saying that giving people the money directly to spend it immediately into the economy for their needs is more efficient and cost saving way of getting food onto people’s tables?
1 Like
IOW…you’re admitting that “feelings” are a very important aspect to libs?
Compassion?..Absolutely. Or is compassion a bad thing in Cons eyes now? What ever happened to compassionate conservatism?
If you’re claiming compassion, why are you quibbling over the cost?
Well this is just legitimately funny.
Do you have a point?
Yes. It’s genuinely funny, two egomaniac politicians having a spat over who gets to claim desperately needed aid for nothing other than their own election chances.
1 Like
Well the difference being that the mayor provided nothing. Just a ■■■■ bird who hates Trump.
