One of my fav parts of the report was where Sarah Baby had to admit to Mueller that her statements to the press were not based on facts. She had to admit that she lied. I will be surprised if she ever does another press briefing.
To me this is little different than an undergrad saying “I read War and Peace. Okay, I didn’t read it, but I skimmed through enough of it to know what I already heard - it’s about Russians.”
I’m not saying you can’t read, I’m saying you haven’t read the entirety of the report in so brief a time - no one has. It doesn’t mean you can’t have an opinion about what you skimmed, but don’t try to suggest you’ve read the entire thing in so brief a time. It undermines your position.
Lets put it this way…nothing I’ve basically seen wasn’t new nor surprising.
And I haven’t seen any really solid evidence on obstructionism…nothing more then innuendos and speculations/hearsay etc.
As for Russian trying to interfere…yes they did.
But lets talk about that Mueller didn’t tell you…he didn’t tell you that Intel/FBI tried to set Trump up. Did you see that?
Hardly surprising, Donald was whining right up until they announced he won that the 2016 election was rigged against him. So what’s a little FBI setup by comparison? Everybody’s out to get the poor man.
Are journalists able to ask a follow up question? The one that springs to mind in the aftermath of the Mueller report release for S H Sanders would be: “What you have just said, is that a lie?”