Lewandowski driving frustrated Chairman Jerry Nadler nuts

After tesitfing before congress 3 time prior.

So now he isn’t giving any information that is outside of Mueller report.

Lewandowski visibly frustrated committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., during the Democrat’s first question – when the witness, in an apparent effort to stall for time, repeatedly asked Nadler to point to the specific section in the Robert Mueller report related to his question. Lewandowski was following White House orders not to discuss confidential conversations with the president beyond what was already public in the former special counsel’s report.

You can view Nadler frustration here.


Democrats’ first impeachment hearing quickly turned hostile Tuesday as their sole witness, former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, stonewalled many of their questions and said they were “focusing on petty and personal politics.”

Apparently other 2 witness ordered to show up didn’t show up.

So what happens when a congressional hearing and no one shows up? It make congress look like they’re weak.

Not sure what the Dems expected from this.

I remember someone else who refused to answer questions outside the mueller report…


So is the important thing to frustrate the Democrats or to obey the law? Let’s get clear about our goals here.

Several times, they’ve quoted the muller report incorrectly placing him on page___. They’re fishing, and he and the GOP are making them look like stupid incompetent boobs.


What law was Lewandowski breaking?

1 Like

Your goals may be to perpetuate the collusion delusion. The horse is dead.

Cory Lewandowski is really coming off well. The dems look like petulent children with the exception of the one gentleman from California…

Contempt of Congress, refusing to cooperate.when subpoenaed.

1 Like

We know the goal here, to harass and get on record any discrepancies to farther harass this administration.

What’s the job of congress?Harassing the president or representing the people?

It’s a short drive.

In reverse.

You do know this is his 4th time before congress.

Buried alive by the CEC perhaps but not dead. To quote the Congressional Record:

Rep. Nadler: The President has repeatedly claimed that your report found that there was no obstruction and the it completely and totally exonerated him. But that is not what your report said, is it?
Mueller: Correct. That is not what the report said.

Well Mitch McConnell was public about the goal of the Senate being to limit Barack Obama to one term, so if what you assert is true, why are you complaining? Can you provide evidence as clear as McConnell’s to support your assertion anyway?

Was the senate tied up in hearing entire time?

Or how about congress?

Delusion indeed.

What’s that suppose to mean?

I personally think that the way that the White House has come up with people being able to plea the Fifth without officially Pleading the Fifth is pretty slick.

1 Like

He’s there. He’s answering questiong that he feels he can.

How is that contempt?