How was it “concentrated”?
There were no “battleground states” in 2020.
Progress!
You didn’t read that before you posted it, did you?
1 Like
That took gumption.
The term fraud is carefully used for the implied legal implication in these little eworld chats.
Cheating is more appropriate. Most of it legal, all of it near impossible to prove.
Oh, fer Pete’s sake. Somebody has to lose an election. That’s the nature of it. And if you can’t prove something this serious actually happened, it’s irresponsible to whinge on about it.
1 Like
That’s because “fraud” is an actual crime - a wrong that needs be remedied - whereas whing about “legal cheating” is just being a sore loser.
You guys (falsely) claim “fraud” because it sounds a lot better than just throwing a tantrum about how unfair it feels that your guy lost.
3 Likes
You guys?
THESE GUYSHow about ?
.
And how about these guys in their own words?
1 Like
You didn’t read that one, either.
So what if people whine about it?
It only hurts when there is a touch of truth.
1 Like
You ignored the entire intent of my post…which was essentially the same thing with a reversed bias.
What does “with a reversed bias” mean?
If that’s the case, rest assured that I find the whining entirely pain free
so now the claims of fraud and the melt down we saw on this forum after the 2020 election was just whining.
I love it when a narrative is changed.
3 Likes
Yes, yes, John. Both sides do it.
1 Like
You know what it means.
Nothing changed and your whining is top notch.
3 Likes
i’m not arguing the right or wrong. I’m arguing the affect.
i heard for years that the the russian influence on social media didn’t affect 2016. not i’m hearing that twitter’s moderator on their social media in 2020 made a difference.
seems inconsistent.
lol.
Sure, sure.
