Let's Look at Illegal Immigration, Shall We?

Politics
61

He should.

62

When children are exploited and flood the border we must help as best we can.

We know kids are being used for entry and sex industry. This is why we have laws…To prevent abuse.

Being detained inside a fence pending verification is done with the tacit approval of the occupant who brought themself in the hope of being an exception to the lawful process…Unless it was an exploited child…Who we will find and save

63

For the left it’s ok to criticize it after the fact, not while it’s in place and they’re in control.

2 Likes
64

…or raped…or murdered?

The media labels the protective enclosure as a cage…to feed the sheople.

2 Likes
65

Well, in Obama’s defense, cages are better than handing them over to child traffickers, oh wait, he did that too.

3 Likes
66

ICE killed them?

67

We did it to protect them! Want to have a push up contest buddy?

1 Like
68

Which of course never happened.

69

How did they die and why?

Outline each case and provide links.

70

No evidence was provided that these children separated from their parents were being trafficked. In fact Twump didnt care, which is why his AG clearly stated it was for deterrence.

71

No they really arent done by the approval of the occupant lol…

72

That’s a complete fabrication on your part.

The children were only separated when the accompanying “parents” were suspect.

73

Lol no they werent.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1MO00C

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/06/19/here-are-the-administration-officials-who-have-said-that-family-separation-is-meant-as-a-deterrent/%3FoutputType=amp

This took me about 2 mins to find.

74

It does help deter them. That doesn’t change the fact that the BP and ICE are only separating them when there’s a reason to do so.

1 Like
75

Attempting to justify their own hyprocricy. :wink:

76

For one thing they are conflating the “asylum seekers” with the outright illegals.

If you go to jail your kids don’t go with you, that shouldn’t shock anyone.

1 Like
77

The fact that they admitted it was for deterrence proves otherwise. Just own up to it. Its ok

78

When have i ever defended such policy under anyone?

79

Yeahhh minor civil offenses dont get you separated from your child. At least American criminals are not left completely in the dark as to where their children are. Before someone comes up with the DNA excuse, the burden lies in the state to prove the child isnt theirs.

80

Sure you can you dog-faced pony soldier boy… did I get that right?

1 Like