Figured it out late in life couldn’t find a man eh?
Read her bio. She’s been involved in politics for years, she’s no neophyte.
Defend it!
thinkingman: Rodeo:America cannot advance when the primary criteria for these very important jobs is skin color and who a person sleeps with
nothing matters more to Democrats than this though. It is the prism through which they view everything because they think it is “progressive”
what it actually is is a slap in the face for anyone of color who actually worked to achieve
Read her bio. She’s been involved in politics for years, she’s no neophyte.
Gotta make sure she’s registered to vote in CA though. I hope they don’t miss that step when she becomes a senator. Can you vote on legislation before the senate if you’re not registered to vote in the state you’re representing?
Excellent pick! Congratulations Californians!
I would say involved in abortion marketing would be more accurate.
When I see her name my mind sometimes goes to laff-a-lose-a
Weird.
I am sure she will do better than Fetterman.
I don’t know if the US Senate has a rule like that, but I doubt that they do.
I don’t know if the US Senate has a rule like that, but I doubt that they do.
You just think he’d be able to, you know… find a resident of the state for this role.
When I see her name my mind sometimes goes to laff-a-lose-a
Weird.
That name is to avoid confusion.
That question is garnering toxic levels of avoidance.
If technically legal…It still smells wrong.
Read her bio. She’s been involved in politics for years, she’s no neophyte.
Being involved in politics has nothing to do with it. Her particular political involvement is peddling abortion. Imho that’s a negative. This country has too many politicians.
She lives in Maryland and isn’t even registered to vote in California.
Supreme_War_Pig:I don’t know if the US Senate has a rule like that, but I doubt that they do.
You just think he’d be able to, you know… find a resident of the state for this role.
She lived there for 12 years before moving to head a non profit.
Now she will be moving back. Seems ok to me.
Oh, OK. Avoid confusion…Got it.
She Has a home in CA. Should be a simple matter to update her residency.
She Has a home in CA.
She will have.
Mountain_Soldier: Supreme_War_Pig:I don’t know if the US Senate has a rule like that, but I doubt that they do.
You just think he’d be able to, you know… find a resident of the state for this role.
She lived there for 12 years before moving to head a non profit.
Now she will be moving back. Seems ok to me.
I lived in CA for a year and a half in the Army. Guess that makes me qualified too.
PurpnGold: Mountain_Soldier: Supreme_War_Pig:I don’t know if the US Senate has a rule like that, but I doubt that they do.
You just think he’d be able to, you know… find a resident of the state for this role.
She lived there for 12 years before moving to head a non profit.
Now she will be moving back. Seems ok to me.
I lived in CA for a year and a half in the Army. Guess that makes me qualified too.
She lived there a lot longer than you…
Mountain_Soldier: PurpnGold: Mountain_Soldier: Supreme_War_Pig:I don’t know if the US Senate has a rule like that, but I doubt that they do.
You just think he’d be able to, you know… find a resident of the state for this role.
She lived there for 12 years before moving to head a non profit.
Now she will be moving back. Seems ok to me.
I lived in CA for a year and a half in the Army. Guess that makes me qualified too.
She lived there a lot longer than you…
So what’s the proper length of time one must reside there? She lived there, I lived there…
What’s the quota number?