Kentucky to quarantine anyone attending easter services

[WuWei]

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

Good thing I don’t believe it evolves! And I don’t see it as a hindrance.

You aren’t a lib.

Given that Optrader was reply to you replying to me, it seems reasonable that he saw my expressed belief as an instance of a liberal believing in a living constitution who consciously believes the document is a hindrance.

Not liberal, lib. You’re not a lib.

Does he not use those terms interchangeably?

Probably, it’s standard practice. It is incorrect.

Let’s ask him. Hey @Optrader !

[Optrader]

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

Good thing I don’t believe it evolves! And I don’t see it as a hindrance.

You aren’t a lib.

Given that Optrader was reply to you replying to me, it seems reasonable that he saw my expressed belief as an instance of a liberal believing in a living constitution who consciously believes the document is a hindrance.

Not liberal, lib. You’re not a lib.

Does he not use those terms interchangeably?

Probably, it’s standard practice. It is incorrect.

Let’s ask him. Hey @Optrader !

I recognize the difference between liberal in the classic sense and liberal or “lib” used today. I sometimes use them interchangeably but most people don’t know or make that distinction. I know the few here who identify as liberal in the classic sense so when I say liberal here, yes, I am referring to libs and not our classic liberals… I should be more precise to avoid confusion.

[Samson_Corwell]

@Optrader

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

Good thing I don’t believe it evolves! And I don’t see it as a hindrance.

You aren’t a lib.

Given that Optrader was reply to you replying to me, it seems reasonable that he saw my expressed belief as an instance of a liberal believing in a living constitution who consciously believes the document is a hindrance.

Not liberal, lib. You’re not a lib.

Does he not use those terms interchangeably?

Probably, it’s standard practice. It is incorrect.

Let’s ask him. Hey @Optrader !

I recognize the difference between liberal in the classic sense and liberal or “lib” used today. I sometimes use them interchangeably but most people don’t know or make that distinction. I know the few here who identify as liberal in the classic sense so when I say liberal here, yes, I am referring to libs and not our classic liberals… I should be more precise to avoid confusion.

Was your previous reply (A) to his reply to me (B) including my post (C) in what you were talking about?

---

A:

@Optrader

Most libs aren’t aware of what the constitution says and since they believe it “evolves” they don’t care what it actually does say anyway. They see the constitution as a hindrance to their agenda. Let’s hope Trump gets to appoint at least two more young judges to the Supreme Court.

B:

@WuWei

There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

This is what it actually says. As long as no law is made (remember incorporation) there is no violation.

C:

@Samson_Corwell

Good thing I don’t believe it evolves! And I don’t see it as a hindrance.

[Optrader]

@Samson_Corwell

@Optrader

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

@WuWei

@Samson_Corwell

Good thing I don’t believe it evolves! And I don’t see it as a hindrance.

You aren’t a lib.

Given that Optrader was reply to you replying to me, it seems reasonable that he saw my expressed belief as an instance of a liberal believing in a living constitution who consciously believes the document is a hindrance.

Not liberal, lib. You’re not a lib.

Does he not use those terms interchangeably?

Probably, it’s standard practice. It is incorrect.

Let’s ask him. Hey @Optrader !

I recognize the difference between liberal in the classic sense and liberal or “lib” used today. I sometimes use them interchangeably but most people don’t know or make that distinction. I know the few here who identify as liberal in the classic sense so when I say liberal here, yes, I am referring to libs and not our classic liberals… I should be more precise to avoid confusion.

Was your previous reply (A) to his reply to me (B) including my post (C) in what you were talking about?

---

A:

@Optrader

Most libs aren’t aware of what the constitution says and since they believe it “evolves” they don’t care what it actually does say anyway. They see the constitution as a hindrance to their agenda. Let’s hope Trump gets to appoint at least two more young judges to the Supreme Court.

B:

@WuWei

There is no separation of church and state in the Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

This is what it actually says. As long as no law is made (remember incorporation) there is no violation.

C:

@Samson_Corwell

Good thing I don’t believe it evolves! And I don’t see it as a hindrance.

I made the same point earlier in the thread in response to a poster who referenced the constitutional separation of church and state.

Since we were on the same page in our response, I just added my comment about the well established lib views regarding the constitution.

I didn’t see any post in this thread regarding your particular views, but then I only skimmed it. When the replies start stretching out into columns of single letters to accommodate multiple responses, I’m prone to do that and I see a lot of your points were in that stretched section… must have missed your points in there.

[WildRose]

You can maintain hygienic and social distancing standards in a church.

[WildRose]

You can live just fine without a lot of things currently deemed “essential”.

[WildRose]

It’s illegal without a permit which is a direct violation of the 1st Amendment.

A preacher was repeatedly arrested for reading the bible in public to people standing in line outside of a DMV office.

That is oppression by any reasonable definition.

[sikofit]

It’s about time America came to its senses and realized that Cannabis is essential but structured religion is not

[Physics_Hunter]

100,000,000?

Sorry Scott, Christians aren’t evil enough

[Physics_Hunter]

And the parting on the Left, is now parting on the Right…

[WildRose]

The Constitution says otherwise and the AG has warned the governors their policies are in violation.

[Borgia_dude]

@WildRose

You can maintain hygienic and social distancing standards in a church.

I didn’t say one couldn’t.

[sikofit]

@WildRose

The Constitution says otherwise and the AG has warned the governors their policies are in violation.

Barr isn’t going to do a damn thing about Cannabis. It’s a losing move

[Camp]

Strange.

New cases in KY are dropping.

[WildRose]

My post had absolutely nothing to do with dope. Perhaps trying to read my posts in context and unaltered would be helpful.

[moonshine]

yesterday they had 225 new cases. third highest daily count.

[WildRose]

With a two week latency period in most cases how exactly does this relate to attending Easter Services?

[highroller]

If killing school children with assault rifles doesn’t rile this country up enough to ban them, you don’t have to worry about it.

[fallenturtle]

@johnwk2

And by that standard, the communist/socialist controlled Democrat Leadership does want to disarm American citizens. So, you are wrong!

There is no such thing as the “communist/socialist controlled Democrat Leadership”. So, you are wrong!

@johnwk2

Perhaps because you have not been paying attention;

Also see Harris asserting we, the people, have no need for “assault weapons”, which means the very kind of contemporary firearm a foot solder would have to protect against a despotic government.

Thank you for providing evidence that the right to keep and bear arms isn’t really in danger anymore… its more an issue of which types of arms you can keep and bear.