Their all he’s got.
Resources on Voter Fraud Claims
Credible research and investigation demonstrates fraud by voters at the polls is exceedingly rare.
Their all he’s got.
I don’t buy it for a second…so stop repeating your illogical nonsense.
Right because facts and data aren’t what do it for you…I get it.
Feewings…
Facts and data have been presented showing how there is no evidence of fraud with mail in voting.
No facts and data are provided to show the opposite…just the “feewing” that it must be.
The fact is, there is NO area where there isn’t fraud…PERIOD and your feelings don’t change that fact.
People who commit crimes expect to be rewarded, there’s no payout for voter fraud.
JayJay:Right because facts and data aren’t what do it for you…I get it.
Feewings…
Facts and data have been presented showing how there is no evidence of fraud with mail in voting.
No facts and data are provided to show the opposite…just the “feewing” that it must be.
The fact is, there is NO area where there isn’t fraud…PERIOD and your feelings don’t change that fact.
I gave the facts of the prevalence of fraud with mail in ballots.
You have provided nothing of the kind in return to show it would be rife with fraud.
Provide facts and data and then you can talk about feelings.
The fact is, there is NO area where there isn’t fraud…PERIOD and your feelings don’t change that fact.
It’s fun to make things up and swear they’re facts.
It’s fun to make things up and swear they’re facts.
We should make a Big Foot Protection Law! I’ve never seen one, but I know they exist and this should have legislation to protect them
It’s fun to make things up and swear they’re facts.
So give me the example that proves me wrong? Where is there no fraud?
People who commit crimes expect to be rewarded, there’s no payout for voter fraud.
If you are correct, then please explain why do people vote?
mobulis:People who commit crimes expect to be rewarded, there’s no payout for voter fraud.
If you are correct, then please explain why do people vote?
To elect representatives.
Borgia_dude:Sure. Fraud exists. It doesn’t mean it is endemic. Is fraud common in your company?
If you’re speaking of my industry, fraud exists. If you’re speaking of me personally, I’ve set processes in place to prohibit it and it’s being inspected at minimum…on a monthly basis.
Voter Impersonation
19 studies and investigations, some by conservatives, that came up with no substantive fraud
Illegal alien voting
12 studies/investigations that came up with no substantive fraud
Court cases on voter fraud
4 cases where the people arguing for fraud could not find substantively evidence of fraud
Govt investigations into voter fraud
9 investigations coming up with practically nothing
Smyrna: mobulis:According to the site.
1,277 instances of fraud
1,102 convictions.
So nope not a problem.What that proved is it’s existence. So first…you’re full of ■■■■■ Now this needs to be fully examined, by 3rd party, non-politically affiliated professionals.
Again.
1,277 instances of fraud
1,102 convictions.
So nope not a problem. The system works.
Yeah, think about the billions of votes over the last few decades. Let’s be conservatives and only use 1 billion votes. 1277/1,000,000,000 = 0.00013%. That’s worth spending millions of dollars on investigating.
How’s Trump doing on this issue? I mean, other than using it as fear mongering. What has he done?
The biggest investigation into voter fraud began in 2017 by the Trump Administration and the blue states refused to turn over any data to the Task Force which should tell us everything we need to know on the subject.
Our “Friends” here quickly joined the clapping seal brigade in cheering them for doing so.
North Dakota, South Carolina and Texas are Blue?
Smyrna: LimaIndiaBravo:The president had a “voter fraud taskforce” that he dismantled because they couldn’t find any voter fraud.
Do you have any verified instances of voter fraud that would justify such legislation?
According to the site.
1,277 instances of fraud
1,102 convictions.
So nope not a problem.
And delving into that list… the instances go back nearly 30 years… so at those numbers it is statistically insignificant.
Not even a rounding error.
Voter Impersonation
19 studies and investigations, some by conservatives, that came up with no substantive fraudIllegal alien voting
12 studies/investigations that came up with no substantive fraudCourt cases on voter fraud
4 cases where the people arguing for fraud could not find substantively evidence of fraudGovt investigations into voter fraud
9 investigations coming up with practically nothing
post your links
To elect representatives.
Bam…the reward which means you’re wrong again. Do you ever get tired of losing?
Borgia_dude:Voter Impersonation
19 studies and investigations, some by conservatives, that came up with no substantive fraudIllegal alien voting
12 studies/investigations that came up with no substantive fraudCourt cases on voter fraud
4 cases where the people arguing for fraud could not find substantively evidence of fraudGovt investigations into voter fraud
9 investigations coming up with practically nothingpost your links
Here you go…but we both no it’s is futile. You will never change your position.
Credible research and investigation demonstrates fraud by voters at the polls is exceedingly rare.
Dats wite. In everything else, mankind has fraud but in this one area…we be perfect
No one mentioned perfect.
You claim to want the facts., Yet, when the facts disagree with your opinion, you are in denial. Why?
You claimed you were unaware of any national studies regarding in person voter fraud. I gave you several, which were conducted over the last 20+ years. One was from the Bush admin.
And they all say the same thing…it is extremely rare, and has no impact.
Sheeple indeed.
Smyrna:Dats wite. In everything else, mankind has fraud but in this one area…we be perfect
No one mentioned perfect.
You claim to want the facts., Yet, when the facts disagree with your opinion, you are in denial. Why?You claimed you were unaware of any national studies regarding in person voter fraud. I gave you several, which were conducted over the last 20+ years. One was from the Bush admin.
And they all say the same thing…it is extremely rare, and has no impact.
Sheeple indeed.
The lack of evidence is kind of proof that we need to investigate more and why we need to stay Vigilant by requiring in person voting and voter ID.