Right on! 
Don’t forget intersectionality.
It depends. If one side is arguing for equality of outcome regardless of ability or effort, I would be opposed to that. However, as I said, this was just a vague platitude ad.
Affirmative action?
Amazing from the forums chief reparations advocate eh?
1 Like
Isn’t that in and of itself racist?
More racism is not an effective way to combat racism.
1 Like
Equity
Biden is a liberal. Harris is a prog. Nancy is a liberal. Sanders is a prog.
Doubtful that the progs can get any of their agenda done. Too many realist liberals.
Allan
No, it is not racism. It is… EQUITY!!!
You suggesting affirmative action be replaced or augmented.
How long of a timeline until the success phase?
End up at…is messing me up. Makes no sense.
Equity is why white privilege is so important.
1 Like
Am I? Strange.
It never ends and there is no “success phase”. Are you kidding? The criticism doesn’t even have to be valid, why would it end?
Racism is, it’s not some kind of anomaly.
Even if everyone in the world was mixed race, one of your halves would be accused of being racist against one of my halves.
“End” 
that’s cute.
1 Like
Maybe Kimberle Crenshaw.
C’mon man.
All humanistic traits that need to be “fixed” can be “fixed” legislatively, we just haven’t been doing it right, yet.
We’re almost there, I can feel it. 
1 Like
“Equitable treatment means we all end up at the same place”
“End up” means “starting line” in track? Huh, I always thought it was the finish line.
@EternalVigilance you made my day with this thread. Thank you.
2 Likes
Because Harris made it one.
3 Likes
I disagree. Being a dem won’t save anyone.
A glimpse inside the box.
Seems some don’t like it.
Did she describe what that “same place” meant?
It was partisan long before Harris was born. Are you new to the United States?
