I’ve got to say I agree for the most part. While I could believe it’s a possibility, I hate the timing of this crap, and an accusation doesn’t mean guilt.
Show the evidence, and come forward in a timely manner.
I do think the Congressional payoffs all need to be outed and probably booted. And I can’t for the life of me figure out why metoo has not gone after academics. There are probably thousands of professors who abused their power with young students.
If her oath before Congress is being held up as some kind of defense of what she actually said, then I’m gonna have to point out all of her inconsistencies and misleading statements as a reason for charging her with perjury.
Sure. If you think there is enough to charge her with perjury which requires a showing of intent to submit inconsistent testimony then call your congressman.
It’s not whether he was believable, it’s the importance of the lack of corroboration. Isn’t that the standard you guys kept hairpinf on “nobody saw it, nobody remembers”. Ruh roh