Libbies better think long and hard about whether they want to set the precedence of impeaching a president for the flimsiest of reasons. If you go down this road you should fully expect the next Democratic president to also get impeached for trivial stuff like wearing a tan suit.
^ Totally trust this guy to make “perfect” phone calls to world leaders about political opponents. Would never pressure a president of another country to open an investigation into you #1 political opponent to gain an advantage.
I mean Doug, seriously, dude, seriousssssslllyyyyyyyyy - look at this guy
Has trump ever spoken to a world leader about investigating anyone other than a political rival?
If he’s so worried about corruption, surely some other names have come up.
Apparently there’s a bit of a division at Fox News these days.
It’s a shame he sees this as a ‘resistance’ issue. It’s really just a ‘fact’ issue.
It’s really to weaken our president when he negotiates with communist China and North Korea. It’s plainly obvious what the communists and socialists who have taken over the Democrat Party are doing.
JWK
It’s not democrats who are destroying the country, stupid. It’s the Democrat Party Leadership that is destroying the Country by trying to overturn an election with a witch-hunt, mislabeled as being an impeachment inquiry.
Napolitano would be better served by producers and camera men who aren’t huffing whippets. The hell is that zoom/shake/zoom/unfocus and hot gtr licks supposed to help?
People are convicted in the US every day with far less evidence…
OJ will find the real killer someday. Keep hope alive.
1 Like
“it’s still real to me” says the adult WWE fan to the wrestler.
1 Like
Should have put money on it happening but the odds would have been VERY,VERY short
Whoah. Didn’t see that one coming. I feel like that was well struck.
1 Like
Because they are victims…all of them and that’s how they see things
Me either. As Gomer Pyle would say, “Gooooooooooooolllllllllllllllllllllyyyy!”
Right. Since he never made such a statement we know that isn’t true.
We know what he has said about Joe and Hunter Biden.
He doesn’t say he wants to find out if they’re guilty.
He says they are guilty.
He says it with absolutely zero evidence.
In fact, that’s the side benefit of all of this…he and those in the CEC that support him get to keep saying it over and over with zero evidence.
You, of course, are free to compartmentalize how you wish.
Although I am fascinated to know if the people that do compartmentalize like this are aware of what Trump and the CEC say and just ignore it?
Ot if they’ve actually trained their brains to believe he and the CEC never say it.
He said they are guilty of treason? Produce the quotes and links please.
Did you train yourself in such deflection, or does it come naturally to you?
Treason was never the charge against the Bidens, but you just trotted it out there like you 100% believed it was.
2 Likes
Perhaps following the conversation would be helpful. There was no deflection.
