Listening to him talk.
1 Like
I think the Democrat notion that investigation = dirt, when applied to Biden, tells us a lot about Biden.
Private? Don’t you listen to what he actually says? It’s glaringly obvious.
1 Like
Cable News is just another form of entertainment. It’s certainly not serious or informative. It’s highly emotional and fake.
.^
.
.
Just curious.
If Trump is fighting corruption by asking foreign governments to investigate US Citizens. Who other that Trumps prospective political opponents has Trump contacted foreign government with request to investigate?
.
.
^^^^
No…listening to Trump outright say…and Giuliani outright say…that Biden and his son laundered millions and millions from the Ukraine and China tells us a lot about what Trump was expecting from the “investigations”.
Why do you guys pretend Trump hasn’t completely telegraphed his intentions?
Seriously…do you honestly not hear Trump and Giuliani when they speak? Or do you actually hear them and decide to just ignore them?
Either explanation is not flattering.
“You know…we’ll have to look into that”.
And that is called “inductive reasoning” as opposed to “deductive reasoning”…
JWK
It’s not democrats who are destroying the country, stupid. It’s the Democrat Party Leadership that is destroying the Country by trying to overturn an election with a witch-hunt, falsely called an impeachment.
Wrong, he gets about 2.8 million viewers.
https://www.americanow.com/story/social/2019/07/07/heres-how-hannity-carlson-and-rachel-maddow-are-doing-ratings
Where in the world did you get that he had way less than a million viewers?
There is no way on earth you believe that Donald Trump, based on who he is, did not intend for this “investigation” to end one way - in a way that was as bad as possible for Joe Biden.
Point to one thing, anything, in Trump’s current or past actions or comments that indicate otherwise. Anything. Has this man ever done anything for a purpose not in his interest?
What one “believes” is really irrelevant. What is relevant are facts. Your beliefs appear to be your personal interpretation of a phone call, a phone call in which there are no statements made to conclude beyond doubt that which you merely believe and have conjured up.
JWK
It’s not democrats who are destroying the country, stupid. It’s the Democrat Party Leadership that is destroying the Country by trying to overturn an election with a witch-hunt, mislabeled as being an impeachment inquiry .
I was just suggesting what the twitter in chief would say as it seems to be his stock in trade to attempt to belittle people who talk against him. I mean he does it to the failing New York times whos readership and stock has risen since Mr Red hat has been in charge
How Trump wanted the investigation to come out is irrelevant. The fact is he did not ask for Ukraine to come up with a specific conclusion, he asked them for investigations of possible corruption.
Oh, yes, I’m sure the Ukrainians felt that “how Trump wanted the investigation to come out” was completely irrelevant. Surely, they never felt any pressure for this investigation to turn up any results. Do you really want to go with that? Do you think that passes a smell test?
Yes, my opinion requires me to make an assumption about the message the Ukrainians were receiving, but it a very reasonable assumption. They were desperate for the defense money. Trump leveraged that. Anybody with any common sense or familiarity with diplomacy recognizes this.
Yes, your opinion requires you to make assumptions. And you should not impeach when the evidence is based on assumptions in your head.
Yes, I am making reasonable assumptions based on a timeline of events and overwhelming circumstantial evidence. We convict citizens for murder, and execute them, based on assumptions made on circumstantial evidence. We can impeach a president.
You can impeach a President based on flimsy made up evidence because the House is made up of Trump haters searching for something to impeach over.
You cannot convict.
It’s not flimsy and made up. It’s substantial and real.
Yes, it’s unlikely then can convict. Who cares? This is about principle at this point.
3 Likes
1 Like
Exactly. What happened to the “party of principles”?
