Judge Amy Barrett's Confirmation

[WuWei]

Common sense gun safety laws?

Extremist ideological judge?

Blumenthal is a DH.

[WuWei]

Crazy Mazie is next after lunch.

[Ben_Natuf]

@Piper

@Ben_Natuf

Kamala is confined to the basement and Fienstien is tied up searching for loud dogma.

Is Kamala on this committee?

She may be coming to us from Joe’s basement.

yes she is. she pretty much led the attempt to personally destroy Kavanaugh with an assist from the dogma whisperer.

[gooddad409]

@WuWei

Crazy Maisy is next after lunch.

Oh Boy! She’s the absolute pits…or very close to it.

[WuWei]

Interesting comment from Biden

“The only court packing going on right now is going on with Republicans… It’s not constitutional what they’re doing,” Biden told reporters, arguing the vacancy caused by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg should not be filled until after November’s presidential election.

Biden takes heat after saying confirming Barrett would not be 'constitutional’

Obviously he has no idea what he’s talking about. 47 years.

[zonulet]

@Piper

Klobuchar doesn’t know where she is.

Trying to hard to remember her folksy joke for the event.

[Camp]

Incoherent…Like we have said all along.

Biden is getting reckless with his falsehoods. The key for the politician is to be savvy about it…plausible.

[WuWei]

Kamala will be coming up soon.

[Mountain_Soldier]

@GrandWazoo

I watched a interesting segment on TV last week. They were talking about RBG and how in her hearings she set the standard by not answering any question that required a response to a hypothetical situation. I had not realized that it went back to her. I think that most of America really doesn’t know her. So these hearings are always good for those who are interested in her thought process. I remember watching the hearings for John Roberts. Biden and some of the other Democrats tried their best to trip him up. And the hearings really showed how smart he was. I told my conservative business partner that it would not take him long to become Chief Justice. And it didn’t.

And Biden didn’t vote for a single damn one of Bush’s nominees. Or Trump’s… think the last time he did was over thirty years ago. ■■■■ that guy. He’s an ideologue.

[WuWei]

Mazie: “Illegitimate process”, no it isn’t.

[conan]

That’s what I’m figuring.

Joe says you have to wait whether he would stack the court…he’s waiting on if Barrett gets seated. If she isn’t Biden won’t. If she does Biden will.

Bu the truth is…I’m thinking they would anyway.

Libs had that court for 80 years…80 years. They think it’s theirs.

[pensieve_seeker]

DH= Deranged harpy?

[WuWei]

Designated Hater

[Mountain_Soldier]

@PeterGriffin

There’s also the whole point of packing the court through this nomination and McConnells efforts: rolling back the Voting Rights Act, which is back before SCOTUS.

For a party that has given up appealing to a majority of the electorate, having a judiciary that are enthusiastic supporters and collaborators in vote suppression is one of the ways a minority regional party can cling to power.

The voting goons are back.

Trump’s New Supreme Court Is Coming for the Next Elections

Just another reason that supports and justifies a Democratically controlled Senate and WH expanding the judiciary to more reflect the electorate and not a narrow slice of white rural voters.

Ahh, so all liberal decisions all the time. What tripe.

[zonulet]

The “hearing” is a Democrat campaign event. I am certain Kamala has her speech ready to go.

[conan]

@PeterGriffin

Bring on the Dems court packing! A 6-3 conservative majority is so far outside of the mainstream and in no way represents the American electorate.

See…right here. He thinks the courts are his…after 80 years.

He claims the court wouldn’t represent Americans. Well the courts didn’t represent America 80 years ago…60 years ago or 40 and 20.

Through those court actions. most cases America was dragged to extreme were are witnessing today.

[zonulet]

In Maize’s world, anything where men have a voice is considered an Illegitimate process.

[DOLOOP]

@PeterGriffin

There has been chatter in the ANTIFA sites that actually control the Democratic Party that they’ll ask Barrett if she’s familiar with the Emoluments clause, she will give her understanding of it and then they’ll list of every violation of the Emoluments clause and then hoe she would handle such a situation. And then run on down the list.

She’s going to get confirmed but there’s no reason to not let her pick up a bunch of Trump skid marks along the way.

Bring on the Dems court packing! A 6-3 conservative majority is so far outside of the mainstream and in no way represents the American electorate.

Five of those justices will have been appointed by Presidents who came in second in the popular vote.

Crazy, huh?

The country cannot long endure when consent of the governed becomes quaint.

[WorldWatcher]

@Mountain_Soldier

And Biden didn’t vote for a single damn one of Bush’s nominees. Or Trump’s… think the last time he did was over thirty years ago. ■■■■ that guy. He’s an ideologue.

Well you made a claim that Biden had NEVER voted to confirm a GOP SCOTUS nominee yesterday. That was proven false.

Today you have changed the language, but again you are incorrect. Bush nominated David Souter to the SCOTUS and Biden voted “Yea” to confirm. Biden did vote “nay” on the Clarence Thomas nomination.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

[Camp]

I was in for Richards cranium.