Did you or did you not say those that acted on the 6th, and broke into the capital, were:
Defending people right to express their grievances
Yes, or no.
Yesā¦and?
The house does impeachments. Not an abuse of power.
The constitution gives the house the power.
Allan
Thank you.
No further questions.
You still canāt explain why Iām authoritarian can you?
Your support/defense of those that broke into the capital, as āDefending people right to express their grievancesā is all that is needed.
If you cannot see itā¦so be it.
Ohā¦so we should have shot themā¦is that what youāre telling me?
Canāt say I see it either. What if they wanted to topple the current government to install a less authoritarian government than we have now?
1 Like
Of course not.
But it does appear that you equate "Defending people right to express their grievancesā, to those that invaded, looted and wreaked havoc inside the capitalā¦because their guy lost.
Do you equate āDefending people right to express their grievancesā to what transpired on Jan. 6?
Rioting is a form of expressing grievances. And commonly used. Itās in the toolbox.
2 Likes
How is that any different then destroying livelihoodsā¦unless you think capital is sacred grounds.
1 Like
They were aggrieved of their election loss and expressed their desire to seize power through violence.
2 Likes
Grievances
ā¦over idolizing a pol.
Irrelevant. Their grievances are just as real to them as yours are to you.
1 Like
Sorryā¦their grievances were fueled by conspiracy theories, lies, and bull feces, mostly spewed by the former POTUS.
I do not need to agree with their grievancesā¦but they should be based in reality.
Perhaps, but they are their grievances, not yours. You donāt get a say.
And yours are based on mythology and alchemy.
1 Like
