So studies show that if you provide taxpayer money to benefit companies, those companies are benefitted. Takes no study for that. How about the taxpayers?
Thre is a website, maybe you ahve heard of it.
It is called AliBab.com
It is filled with . . . . (you’ll never guess) . . . not with evil Amercian compamies who mvoed overseas but with the Chinese companies tht are utting US companies out of business.
Q1
If a Chinese company is putting a US company out of business the US company
a.) Go die. Just die you evil corproation die! Losing 100% of all jobs and 100% of all tax revenues.
b.) Open where it is cheaper, saving a few jobs and saving some tax revenue.
Q2
A company grosses $1 million the same year it spends $2 million moving its factory (taking a net loss for the year.) The company should:
a.) Tell th truth to investors. (No accounting fraud. No Enrons) admit it is taking a loss.
b.) Lie. Cheat. Cover-up. Commit fraud and pretend it had zer oexpenses. (Just like Enron). It is an American corporation dammit it is evil and unike corporations everywhere else in the world American corporations should pay taxes on their gross pretending they had zero expenses .
(HINT: Whn you think about things instead of seeing the world in freshman year stereotypes like “American corporations are evil” you can really open your eyes and learn many hard truths.)
No you did not call them “evil”
That was how i characterized your view after your ludicours question about coproratond getting tax “breask” for miving overseas.
It displayed a complete ignorance of the fact that no country anywhere in teh world forces its corporations to pay taxes on expenses. Make X, spend Y, pay taxes on X-Y. that’s not a tax break that is common sense.
It displayed complete ignorance of the fact that typically US coprorations are not moving overseas they are being put out of business by overseas cmpetition. Many close the US plant and die, a few survive the competition long enough to save a few jobs by re-opening the plant overseas.
Chinese textile mills? Steel mills? What did not happen: US facotries mvoved there. What did happen: US factories refused to move there so the business died entirely.
Lemme know if you see any of it being made by US steel Bethlehem steel etc. (You know because so many US factories form US corproations toolk tax breaks and moved there.)
Farm subsidies made sense at one time
(when food security was an issue, just like energy security is one now).
However even then they were handled in a mish-mash fashion.
We have a sugar cane subisidy (making sugar and thus sugary drinks artificially cheap)
But a milk price subsidie (making milk and other healthy food artificially expensive.)
If we keep tose subsidies, (and I am not sure we should) we should probably put them all on the same page.
I think you’re missing the point. The left doesn’t want to foul up pristine landscape. That can be defined anyway you like. Yet when it comes to solar panels, they have no problem clearing out a forest. Or like you said, creating eyesores.