I haven’t heard a mainstream candidate suggest cancelling or weaning us off social security in a long time, if ever.
Not sure what you mean by this.
I haven’t heard a mainstream candidate suggest cancelling or weaning us off social security in a long time, if ever.
Not sure what you mean by this.
As a nation, we don’t want to pay for what we get.
We leave that for future generations to figure out.
I haven’t heard a mainstream candidate suggest cancelling or weaning us off social security in a long time, if ever.
So none of them. We can move on to the next vision if you like.
Not sure what you mean by this.
No? They made you and I dependent on the teat. If we spit it out, we lose. In my case over 40 years. How long to I have to live to get that back?
How did “we” not pay for it?
English is not complicated
I disagree.
Then ask before you assume.
I’ve repeatedly asked you to clarify what you mean in this thread.
I disagree.
As you are free to do.
I’ve repeatedly asked you to clarify what you mean in this thread.
After assuming. You’ve stopped doing that for now, we can move on if you like.
Politics is the art of convincing you my vision is in your best interest in order to get your vote.
So none of them. We can move on to the next vision if you like.
No one is getting rid of social security and no one is talking about doing so, so why are we?
They made you and I dependent on the teat. If we spit it out, we lose. In my case over 40 years. How long to I have to live to get that back?
I agree. That’s basically what I’ve been saying. Social security is entrenched.
I’ve repeatedly asked you to clarify what you mean in this thread.
I will add this; you have to think. I won’t spoon feed.
After assuming. You’ve stopped doing that for now, we can move on if you like.
If I ask, “Do you mean this or do you mean that,” I’m not assuming, I’m asking for clarification.
No one is getting rid of social security and no one is talking about doing so, so why are we?
I don’t know, you brought it up.
I agree. That’s basically what I’ve been saying. Social security is entrenched.
So is everything else. It’s how government works.
So why would it be in your best interest to have more?
It will be interesting to see if we see those stock market threads that have a tendency to pop every time there is a bad day on Wall Street, if Warren or Sanders wins.
I will add this; you have to think. I won’t spoon feed.
See, now you’re asking me to make assumptions about what you’re posting.
WuWei:After assuming. You’ve stopped doing that for now, we can move on if you like.
If I ask, “Do you mean this or do you mean that,” I’m not assuming, I’m asking for clarification.
Ok. That’s fine.
Wall Street Democratic donors warn the party: We’ll sit out, or back Trump, if you nominate Elizabeth Warren
I doubt the democratics care, money probably doesn’t enter into their political equation. Only republicans let money in.
Maybe they’re concerned a woman won’t be able to balance the checkbook.
No reason for them to support a woman who would wreck Wall Street and the Economy.
WuWei:I will add this; you have to think. I won’t spoon feed.
See, now you’re asking me to make assumptions about what you’re posting.
No, I’m not. I’m asking you to think. What I say is not nearly as important as what you think.
WuWei:Wall Street Democratic donors warn the party: We’ll sit out, or back Trump, if you nominate Elizabeth Warren
I doubt the democratics care, money probably doesn’t enter into their political equation. Only republicans let money in.
Maybe they’re concerned a woman won’t be able to balance the checkbook.
No reason for them to support a woman who would wreck Wall Street and the Economy.
How is she going to “wreck” Wall Street?
So why would it be in your best interest to have more?
I haven’t argued that. I’m saying it’s in our best interest to maintain a healthy social security program. It’s the only way you and I will get any of our money back.
No, I’m not. I’m asking you to think. What I say is not nearly as important as what you think.
You post something, I think about it and respond, and you tell me not to make assumptions. I have to make assumptions about what you’re saying in order to respond. There’s no other way.
It will be interesting to see if we see those stock market threads that have a tendency to pop every time there is a bad day on Wall Street, if Warren or Sanders wins.
Yes, they’ll be started by Republicans instead of Democrats.
WuWei:So why would it be in your best interest to have more?
I haven’t argued that. I’m saying it’s in our best interest to maintain a healthy social security program. It’s the only way you and I will get any of our money back.
Oh bull ■■■■ Oryx, there is no “our” best interest in government. Is it in the best interest of a 21 year old to pay social security taxes?