It appears the long-awaited FISA IG Report is coming soon... Predictions?

[mobiusptc]

@CanadianJudo

No one think that

No real Western European anyways

[TheDoctorIsIn]

I would like to start by sincerely thanking you for actually responding to my OP, rather than joining the nonsense about “civil war” and fantasy military coups.

Back to the topic at hand.

McCabe is being accused of lying during internal FBI investigations into pre-election leaks of information damaging to Hillary Clinton.

What does he have to do with the FISA court, or the “wiretapping” of Carter Page?

[NebraskaFootball]

@LucyLou

You don’t think the judges can’t already do that?

Exactly. This has been a national story for a long time now. It’s silly to believe every single Judicial review has not already occurred.

[party-free]

My prediction is that you are right because he will need a little bit more time to cook their report to try and make it look like Trump was spied upon or that there was wrongdoing.

[57Nomad]

@sikofit

@zeitgeist

And your point is …?

That he’s a racist crackpot who is not to be taken seriously

@zeitgeist

well, thats only your opinion

Are you saying racist crackpots should be taken seriously?

[DougBH]

@57Nomad

@sikofit

@zeitgeist

And your point is …?

That he’s a racist crackpot who is not to be taken seriously

@zeitgeist

well, thats only your opinion

Are you saying racist crackpots should be taken seriously?

I think he’s questioning whether the guy is really a racist crackpot. “Racist” is used pretty loosely around here.
Without evidence, it is just an opinion.

[57Nomad]

@DougBH

@57Nomad

@sikofit

@zeitgeist

And your point is …?

That he’s a racist crackpot who is not to be taken seriously

@zeitgeist

well, thats only your opinion

Are you saying racist crackpots should be taken seriously?

I think he’s questioning whether the guy is really a racist crackpot. “Racist” is used pretty loosely around here.
Without evidence, it is just an opinion.

I’ve never heard of him. Googled him, he seems funny.

[wiley8425]

Now hang on. I’m sure there’s a talking cat video out there somewhere that can clear all this right up.

[Zander]

We need more YouTube videos in this thread. There’s no drip drip dripping. I’m bored.

[BlueTex]

@Smyrna

Horrowitz has already shown that he politically tip-toes along the middle line. The fact though that Barr is now the AG, both Durham and Huber have been enacted to also investigate inconsistencies makes me wonder if this one may have a tad more bite. I’m going to go with McCabe being indicted.

I hate to break the news but Huber was taken off the case long ago…

William Barr dishes on what Huber, Horowitz, and Durham are investigating

(Since many of our conservative friends like the Washington Examiner as a source…)

[BlueTex]

@zeitgeist

There a lot of people like me, just check the results of many recent elections in Europe, and the permanent increasing approval ratings of that certain parties in the polls …

Have you checked the results in Italy lately?

[SimplyTrying]

@H_Arendt

@Kelby

@H_Arendt

@TheDoctorIsIn

Various news sources are reporting that IG Horowitz has completed a draft of his report and submitted it on Friday to the DoJ for classifications and redactions.

Following that, the report will be further circulated for comments and accuracy, and two final drafts will be created - a classified version and a public version. At that point, the public report will be released to the public, and the classified report will go to Congress.

Over the last 18 months, many predictions as to what the report will contain have been posted here, each with varying levels of inanity. I thought I’d start this thread to collect all the predictions posters are willing to share as to the contents of the report.

Will the “deep state” finally be taken down? Who is going to jail, and who isn’t? For what crimes?

Or will the report be a dud? Will Horowitz join the “deep state” in the eyes of the right?

I’m leaning towards the latter option, but I guess we’ll see.

I predict everyone will find what they want in the report and keep shouting at each other.

Many people will write “Read the report.”

Any convictions if achieved, will be followed by Felicity Huffman like sentences and those convicted will be lionized by their supporters.

New England will win the Super Bowl.

That last part was completely unnecessary, Sir.

Reported.

Hey, I never said I was rooting for New England to win, only that it seems a likely possibility.

If that qualifies for a ban, so be it.

Nah. We just throw a flag and send you back 10 posts.

[Weedhopper]

This investigation and Hubers and Durhams investigation and Judicial Watch investigations.

[Weedhopper]

McCabe will rat them all out if he is busted.

[LucyLou]

Busted for what?

Taking all who down?

[LucyLou]

@Weedhopper

This investigation and Hubers and Durhams investigation and Judicial Watch investigations.

What is Huber doing?

[NuffSaid]

Lard butt Barr will come out and claim “Obstruction!” and “Collusion!”.

Loyalists will not read the report, but claim that Democrats are guilty. Loyalists will wait until AM radio tells them what to repeat.

[AmusedObserver]

@H_Arendt

Hey, I never said I was rooting for New England to win, only that it seems a likely possibility.

If that qualifies for a ban, so be it.

Pointing out a potential outcome is exactly the same as rooting for it, so I’ve learned on this forum

Just like mentioning inverted yield curves means that you’re praying for a recession.

[NebraskaFootball]

@AmusedObserver

@H_Arendt

Hey, I never said I was rooting for New England to win, only that it seems a likely possibility.

If that qualifies for a ban, so be it.

Pointing out a potential outcome is exactly the same as rooting for it, so I’ve learned on this forum

Just like mentioning inverted yield curves means that you’re praying for a recession.

If you mention that mentioning yield curves means you’re praying for a recession, does that counter the original mention, and mean you’re praying for the opposite? Inquiring minds…

[H_Arendt]

@AmusedObserver

@H_Arendt

Hey, I never said I was rooting for New England to win, only that it seems a likely possibility.

If that qualifies for a ban, so be it.

Pointing out a potential outcome is exactly the same as rooting for it, so I’ve learned on this forum

Just like mentioning inverted yield curves means that you’re praying for a recession.

Thanks for the clarification. I will make a concerted effort to stop worrying about mass shootings in the future, because my thinking of them obviously means I want them to happen.

Who knew?