Is the mainstream media reporting that Robert Mueller is himself under four separate criminal investigations?

zonulet · January 27, 2019, 5:06pm

Tell me something I don’t know.

Jezcoe · January 27, 2019, 5:12pm

Bodecea:

Jezcoe:

Paul_Thomson:

What in particular do you dispute in the article re Mueller. To save reading time you culd start from the Enter Mueller header.and the paragraph beginning “In 1982, Robert Mueller joined the staff of U.S. Attorney William Weld in Boston, Massachusetts. He had previously been in private practice in San Francisco while waiting to be accepted into the U.S. attorney’s office there. His life’s dream was to prosecute. Mueller and Weld concentrated on public corruption cases, targeting and taking down the administration of popular Boston Mayor Kevin White in an investigation widely criticized for “gestapo tactics” and prosecutorial misconduct…”

LaRouche has the trustworthiness level of Alex Jones.

LaRouche was the precurser to Alex Jones.

Yeah… one of them.

When I see my Trump supporting cousins posting stuff on Facebook by William Cooper, I just see the unsinkable rubber ducks of nonsense bubbling to the surface yet again.

zonulet · January 27, 2019, 5:23pm

Wow are you watching me? Just getting ready to whip up some scrambled eggs with salsa. You save time if you just scramble them in the pan. No need for the cup or bowl. Work smarter not harder. Note, no grease yuck. Use butter. Yum

Forcefield · January 27, 2019, 5:50pm

I haven’t the time.

zonulet · January 27, 2019, 5:52pm

Not according to the posting

PeterGriffin · January 27, 2019, 6:06pm

No, mainstream media likes to report on factual things that are actually happening. That is why they aren’t reporting on the wholly invented fantasy of “Muller under 4 criminal investigations”.

Man, a little discernment and discretion in your media diets wouldn’t kill some of you.

zonulet · January 27, 2019, 6:13pm

.[quote=“hwyflier, post:89, topic:123730, full:true”]
Blasphemy. You need to pre mix in a bowl with a dab of whole milk.
[/quote]

I never understood that

Drs · January 27, 2019, 6:36pm

Nah I think only posts that threaten the reality of easily triggered Trumpkins get flagged. They need their safe place while they stroke their support bunnies telling themselves any day now Trump will be made Supreme ruler and will lock up Hillary build his wall and all real media folks as well as Democrats will be put against the wall.

Kelby · January 27, 2019, 6:59pm

Pure fantasy.

JayJay · January 27, 2019, 8:47pm

And it’s still the shortest investigation by a special prosecutor since special prosecutors began being appointed after Watergate.

All the other ones went on far longer.

madasheck · January 27, 2019, 8:54pm

And degrees of parsing. Which is ■■■■■■■■■

SixFoot · January 27, 2019, 9:06pm

Sure is hard to scroll when half the thread is being deleted. lol

Phaedrus · January 27, 2019, 9:11pm

Thanks for the breakdown. Concise and thoughtful as usual.

JayJay · January 27, 2019, 10:17pm

H_Arendt:

Roxiebelle:

The fact that he has been “on the case” for two freaking years and still can’t close the investigation should give pause for thought that something is amiss, with indictments flying like confetti and yet President Trump is still in the Oval office!

How can this be if this guy is the epitome of patriotism, intelligence, ethic’s and morality. That’s because he’s not any of those, he is a leftist political cretin working for the deep state to take down President Trump.

He is doing more to harm the country then Putin could ever dream of doing, talk about a Russian operative… its Mueller!

The argument that Mueller’s investigation is taking too long has no substance at all.

I don’t recall anyone complaining while Kenneth Starr took six years(!) as the Special Counsel in the Clinton Whitewater investigation. And in twenty months, Mueller has produced substantially more indictments, convictions and guilty pleas than Starr produced in six years. And compare the substance of the Mueller investigation – a criminal conspiracy with a foreign power to rig a Presidential election – with Starr’s – an fraudulent real estate transaction in Arkansas that morphed into an investigation into the President lying under oath about an affair. In the long term, which one mattered more.

So then you claim Mueller is a Russian operative;

Did Robert Mueller reverse election related sanctions on Oleg Derispaska? No, that was Trump.
Has Robert Mueller systematically driven from the FBI several of the most prolific and successful agents in the FBI’s Counterintelligence (Russia) branch. No, that was Trump.
Did Robert Mueller precipitously announce a US withdrawal from Syria in line with Putin’s regional aims? No, that was Trump.
Did Robert Muller, in Helsinki, announce he believed Vladimir Putin and GRU’s assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election over the assessment of US intelligence. No, that was Trump.
Did Robert Mueller repeatedly threaten to upend NATO, an act that would achieve one of Putin’s greatest foreign policy ambitions. No, that was Trump.
Did Robert Mueller, start a trade war with China, which led China to with all its US soy bean purchases to Russia, aiding the Russian economy while hurting US farmers. No, that was Trump.
Did Robert Mueller lie repeatedly about the extent to which his staff has been in contact with Russian officials and oligarchs. No, that was Trump.

Can you provide any argument against Mueller that isn’t as easy to pop as a child’s balloon?

You can add in this:

Did Robert Mueller lift sanctions on Rusal and En+? Nope that would be Donald Trump…just about an hour or so ago.

madasheck · January 27, 2019, 11:40pm

What’s with all the innocuous posts being flagged in this thread?

CaughtInTheMiddle · January 28, 2019, 1:06am

I guess scrambled eggs are off limits.

Bill.in.PA · January 28, 2019, 3:05am

I think that a stronger case against the Mueller team comes from many court rulings that clearly show a pattern of misconduct. A prime example is lead prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who has seen multiple convictions overturned on appeal. Courts have repeatedly called him out for distortion and withholding of evidence.

For details see:

SimplyTrying · January 28, 2019, 11:12am

Off topic?

Paul_Thomson · January 29, 2019, 2:36pm

"Huff was charged Tuesday with possession of a 9 mm handgun without a permit and having a small amount of marijuana after he was pulled over for speeding on the New Jersey side of the Walt Whitman bridge.

Huff was also cited for driving while intoxicated by the officer. His attorney, Fortunato Perri Jr., said Huff is licensed to carry in Texas and the gun was not loaded when he was stopped Tuesday morning." https://kval.com/sports/ducks/former-duck-receiver-josh-huff-cut-by-eagles-in-wake-of-arrest-on-gun-drug-charges

“The Philadelphia Eagles released wide receiver Josh Huff Thursday, two days after he was arrested and charged with carrying a 9mm gun without a permit, a magazine containing six hollow point bullets and a small amount of marijuana, the team announced Thursday morning.” By Geoffrey C. Arnold

The Oregonian/OregonLive

No AK 47. No Hundreds of rounds of ammunition. You sound like one of CNN reliable sources.

Grassroots · January 29, 2019, 2:44pm

Every day I thank the lord for not being as gullible as this.