Do you trust the vaccine makers to truthfully report the evidence?
Do you trust government officials to chose of which of the conflicting evidence to use in their analysis?
The long-term risks for COVID and the vaccines are unknown and unknowable. What basis there to say that the vaccines are really any better that the disease in the long term? That is an especially important question for healthy children and young adults who have extremely low short-term risk from disease and have the most to lose in the long term.
The vaccine makers and government officials have lied before when it has suited their agendas and bottom lines. The whistleblowerâs story is just one more example.
There is a problem with using the metric of per 100,000 in states like Maine.
Take for instance where there is the highest incidence of Covid in Maine. Franklin County.
Currently there is a 7 day average of 22 cases. Slightly less than 30,000 people live in the county. So the per 100,000 incidence rate works out to 71 per 100,000.
Which shows an extremely high case rate.
The cases per 100,000 is a useful metric but you have to realize itâs limits when showing what is actually happening within the population. Like take NYC⌠the 7 day average here is 979⌠which is orders of magnitude more cases than in Franklin County Maine but the per 100,000 rate is 12⌠which is pretty low.
Looking at the charts is fine and it is a good metric but without the understanding of what the population actually looks like one cannot point to that and say that it isnât working.
If the FDA is successful with its lawsuit, it will take 55 years to get them to release all the information used to justify the vaccine approval:
In addition, reports are that they lied to reduce the number of deaths for the vaccinated group:
Pfizer told the world 15 people who received the vaccine in its trial had died as of mid-March. Turns out the real number then was 21, compared to only 17 deaths in people who hadnât been vaccinated. . .
At best, the results suggested that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine â now pushed on nearly a billion people worldwide at a cost of tens of billions of dollars and ruinous and worsening civil liberties restrictions â did nothing to reduce overall deaths.
Worse, Pfizer and BioNTech had vaccinated almost all the placebo recipients in the trial shortly after the Food and Drug Administration okayed the vaccine for emergency use on Dec. 11, 2020.
As a result, they had destroyed our best chance to compare the long-term health of a large number of vaccine recipients with a scientifically balanced group of people who had not received the drug.
There is real world data showing that the vaccinated are dying in much much much much much much much smaller numbers than the unvaccinated if they are infected with Covid.
How does a statistically insignificant incidence in deaths that may or may not have been related even mean anything?
This idea that the vaccine does nothing to reduce overall deaths only exists in this weird alternate reality that some trying to construct.