Is the approval of the Pfizer vaccine based on flawed and/or fraudulent data?

I do.

They can spread, vaccinated can can spread. Food servers can spread. Bartenders and bartenderettes like AOC can spread.

We have to live it like we do influenza and other infectious diseases. Glad we have some Merck and Pfizer covid pills on the way.

Just say no to mandates.

You clearly do not understand how mRNA vaccines work.

You would think this would terrify democrats, if any significant number of kids die from this their party is over.

I do.

Every single danger that the vaccine carries is less risky than actually becoming infected with the virus.

Do you trust the vaccine makers to truthfully report the evidence?

Do you trust government officials to chose of which of the conflicting evidence to use in their analysis?

The long-term risks for COVID and the vaccines are unknown and unknowable. What basis there to say that the vaccines are really any better that the disease in the long term? That is an especially important question for healthy children and young adults who have extremely low short-term risk from disease and have the most to lose in the long term.

The vaccine makers and government officials have lied before when it has suited their agendas and bottom lines. The whistleblower’s story is just one more example.

We have real world evidence now.

Millions of people have been vaccinated.

The real world results are fewer infections… when there is a breakthrough infection the outcomes tend to be better by orders of magnitude.

What is it with being vaccinated but every single day coming on here to try to convince who ever is listening that the vaccines don’t work?

What do you get out of it?

Yes, vaccinations appear to be helpful in reducing the risk serious COVID cases. People who are at risk of serious infection should get vaccinated.

On the other hand, the real world has shown no correlation between the number of cases and the fraction of the population that has been vaccinated.

There is a problem with using the metric of per 100,000 in states like Maine.

Take for instance where there is the highest incidence of Covid in Maine. Franklin County.

Currently there is a 7 day average of 22 cases. Slightly less than 30,000 people live in the county. So the per 100,000 incidence rate works out to 71 per 100,000.

Which shows an extremely high case rate.

The cases per 100,000 is a useful metric but you have to realize it’s limits when showing what is actually happening within the population. Like take NYC… the 7 day average here is 979… which is orders of magnitude more cases than in Franklin County Maine but the per 100,000 rate is 12… which is pretty low.

Looking at the charts is fine and it is a good metric but without the understanding of what the population actually looks like one cannot point to that and say that it isn’t working.

Clearly, if your posts are genuine, you do not.

If the FDA is successful with its lawsuit, it will take 55 years to get them to release all the information used to justify the vaccine approval:

In addition, reports are that they lied to reduce the number of deaths for the vaccinated group:

Pfizer told the world 15 people who received the vaccine in its trial had died as of mid-March. Turns out the real number then was 21, compared to only 17 deaths in people who hadn’t been vaccinated. . .

At best, the results suggested that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine – now pushed on nearly a billion people worldwide at a cost of tens of billions of dollars and ruinous and worsening civil liberties restrictions – did nothing to reduce overall deaths.
Worse, Pfizer and BioNTech had vaccinated almost all the placebo recipients in the trial shortly after the Food and Drug Administration okayed the vaccine for emergency use on Dec. 11, 2020.
As a result, they had destroyed our best chance to compare the long-term health of a large number of vaccine recipients with a scientifically balanced group of people who had not received the drug.

https://teamtuckercarlson.com/news/more-people-died-in-the-key-clinical-trial-for-pfizers-covid-vaccine-than-the-company-publicly-reported/

Will it take 55 years to find out that Pfizer lied and people died?

There is real world data showing that the vaccinated are dying in much much much much much much much smaller numbers than the unvaccinated if they are infected with Covid.

How does a statistically insignificant incidence in deaths that may or may not have been related even mean anything?

This idea that the vaccine does nothing to reduce overall deaths only exists in this weird alternate reality that some trying to construct.

This is from that same study.

Far less infection in the vaccinated group. Less infection… less sick people… less sick people… less death.

It is just bonkers how this quixotic mission of trash talking a vaccine for… fun? I guess? just keeps going.