Is everything Trump's fault?

[AceRothstein]

@Paul_Thomson

I couldn’t hear anyone say, "Shoot them. " Could anyone hear someone say, “Shoot them”?

Maybe you should go see an audiologist.

[Paul_Thomson]

@bluedogdem

Would you like to borrow my hearing aid?

I guess so. Are you able to send it to Delhi?

[TommyLucchese]

His Twitter was scrubbed of every post with the words invaders or invasion because it’s no big deal.

[Paul_Thomson]

@JayJay

Sigh…now we have the ‘deny reality’ approach

What do you think of Beto O’Rourke smirking at the death of El Paso victims?

https://t.co/4YDb7WiopY?amp=1

[Smyrna]

@Sknyluv

So what you’re saying is that Trump finds it hard to condemn shooting innocent people? Gotcha.

What I’m saying is, that even though I don’t think Trump handled it right, what the MSM did with it was beyond despicable. Do you agree or do you only look one direction?

[gooddad409]

@Bill.in.PA

If right-wing nutcases attack, then it is Trump’s fault since his rhetoric must have incited them.

If left-wing nutcases attack, then it is also Trump’s fault. His policies and rhetoric are so infuriating that they “forced” a response.

If a Progressive/Socialist/Democrat gets wet because he/she/they/fae/e/ey/ae/per/ve/xe/ze/zie got stuck out in the rain without an umbrella, it is Trump’s fault. Trump’s tweets so are so enraging that they make people forget things. Either that or climate change, which is Trump’s fault as well.

Is there anything that is not Trump’s fault?

Aren’t we all going to be dead in 12 years anyway???

[Vigilante]

Its Obamas fault.

[calirepub]

@TommyLucchese

His Twitter was scrubbed of every post with the words invaders or invasion because it’s no big deal.

Not sure that’s accurate. For instance, this tweet is still on his twitter.

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1010900865602019329?lang=en

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1056919064906469376?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1056919064906469376&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpublish.twitter.com%2F%3Fquery%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Ftwitter.com%252FrealDonaldTrump%252Fstatus%252F1056919064906469376%26widget%3DTweet

[gooddad409]

@Bill.in.PA

That is a bit of hyperbole. If Trump made a similar statement it would be determined to be a “lie” by liberal “fact-checkers”.

On the other hand, consider the often reported factoid is that “hate crimes” are way up because of Donald Trump. Reported hate crimes may be up, but many turn out to be fake:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/18/hoax-hate-crimes-list/

A researcher concluded that only one third of alleged hate-crimes proved to be genuine:

Mr. Reilly eventually compiled a database of 346 hate-crime allegations and determined that less than a third were genuine. Turning his attention to the hoaxes, he put together a data set of more than 400 confirmed cases of fake allegations that were reported to authorities between 2010 and 2017. He allows that the exact number of false reports is probably unknowable, but what can be said “with absolute confidence is that the actual number of hate crime hoaxes is indisputably large,” he writes. “We are not speaking here of just a few bad apples.”

Hate Crime Hoaxes Are More Common Than You Think - WSJ

Of course reports of fake hate crimes are also Trump’s fault since media reports have hyped hate allegations since Trump won the election.

That’s an interesting report.

[gooddad409]

@coolidge

Low black unemployment rate how rascist of trump

Yes. How dare him!

[NuffSaid]

President’s immediate response should have been to tell the person that is not how things are done in the US and there are other ways to address the issue. And then told the audience not to laugh.

[NuffSaid]

CEC appreciates you blaming the media for Trumps words.

[JayJay]

@NuffSaid

President’s immediate response should have been to tell the person that is not how things are done in the US and there are other ways to address the issue. And then told the audience not to laugh.

Literally every politician would have done exactly that…but we’re supposed to feel sorry for Trump being “caught between a rock and a hard place”.

One would think people would expect more from their President…expect that he rise above the passion of the crowd instead of being led by it.

Oh well…

[bluedogdem]

Best president ever

Trump attacks Obama for statement on shootings

[Kevhead]

@Smyrna

It is my contention that the President did not endorse violence but that the way it was propagated by the MSM, it created the anger that would lead to violence. These mass shootings are the result of this propaganda.

His tweets are left wing propaganda? Hiw invaders and rapists are pouring over the borders?

[NuffSaid]

You think that African Americans won’t work because Trump says racist things?

Curious to know what Trump specifically to help one community.

[Smyrna]

@NuffSaid

CEC

Council for Exceptional Children? That’s cool. At least they understand. Now…I wish you did?

[Smyrna]

Notice how the article framed Trump’s response…“attacks”. This is another example of the MSM ratcheting up their rhetoric and creating the emotional atmosphere for mass murderers.

[Paul_Thomson]

@adroit

Maybe this was taken as implicit permission?

Is this a case of the emperor’s nude clothes… I truly can’t hear anything that sounds like "shoot them. " The unreliable media tells me that’s what was said, but it’s not at all discernible on the videos I’ve watched. I think it’s all a con.

Why would Trump say, “Only in the Panhandle could you get away with saying [Shoot them].” ?

Why would that be a Florida thing?

[JayJay]

@Smyrna

Notice how the article framed Trump’s response…“attacks”. This is another example of the MSM ratcheting up their rhetoric and creating the emotional atmosphere for mass murderers.

They called it an attack because it was.

Obama didn’t condemn Trump as Trump falsely accused.

He talked about the rhetoric (didn’t mention Trump by name, but it’s clear that’s who he was talking about).

Trump mentioned the 32 mass shootings during Obama’s term in office, but did he point to any time Obama used rhetoric that would encourage such violence?

That’s the difference here.