i was referring to “big tech” as i indicated
what does msnbc say about it?
dig in deep. be very skeptical that’s good!
(now do that with the climate change)
I have… guess what… the evidence is overwhelming.
That is can cause blood clots.
no it says the are very rare
eat up their spin nom nom nom
when you ignore the evidence you hate it sure is
It is rare. Out of the 50 million doses given in the UK it was linked to 73 deaths due to blood clots.
I am sure that you believe that to be true.
i didn’t dispute thet.
you must also like actual science then
So what did they get wrong and try to cover up?
I do. Decades of research and observation point to one conclusion. That Global Climate change is happening and that it is being caused by human activity.
The only dispute to this is not factual but political.
This vaccine wasn’t the primary vaccine used in the US. It was Pfizer and Moderna and the studies on these two regarding this is more applicable. The fact that AstraZeneca may have been a source of blood clots just motivates that we need to look at this deeper.
definitely not a religion
How many with blood clots didn’t die?
1 Like
big tech censored it and banned people from mentioning it.
like they do with anything that hurts their baby chick democrats. like darling hunter and his laptop of drug abuse, illegal weapons, porn, and kickbacks/schemes for his corrupt father etc etc etc
1 Like
That’s where you© run off the rails.
1 Like
Imagine being able to control so-called educated people so easily.
Would you let that power go to waste? 
1 Like
That is my mind now!
1 Like
K…then why is it that those in our government yelling this, are responsible for allowing these products manufactured in other countries, in the methodology that exacerbates this, to be sold here in the US, thus motivating the cause they claim to be against? You can’t have it both ways.
