I bought a pack of these to help with the signal. Two in my office, two in the router. It solved everything but the 5Ghz. Still only pulls around 72Mbps through the walls. 2.4Ghz is at 195Mbps.
5ghz won’t go through walls. Try positioning range extenders through hallways with line of site and within 40 feet of the source. Even then, you can only have 8 streams, I think.
Why should airlines and their customers sacrifice time, money, and inconvenience for your cell phone performance? What was wrong with cell phone performance under 4G? Were people dying because of slow data transfer speed?
Expressing concerns about the safety of 5G or expressing doubts about evidence-free pronouncements from Washington could result a dangerous pre-dawn SWAT team raid. Raids of this kind have a history of bad health outcomes.
The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) . . . Domestic violent extremists have also viewed attacks against U.S. critical infrastructure as a means to create chaos and advance ideological goals, and have recently aspired to disrupt U.S. electric and communications critical infrastructure, including by spreading false or misleading narratives about 5G cellular technology . . .
On the other hand, if someone other than a telecommunications company set up a C band transmitter in an airport approach zone, they would most likely be arrested on suspicion of terrorism.
Why should telecoms be inconvenienced because the airlines don’t want to upgrade their equipment? They had years to upgrade their altimeters with new filters and did nothing.
5G has already rolled out in 40+ countries. The fight between the airlines and the telecoms is because airlines don’t want to spend the money to upgrade their equipment.