Iowa Passes Make Sense Legislation

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

ITS NOT AN ISSUE!

Obviously it is.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

I just don’t thing a state law is necessary to restrict.

Obviously it is.

[PurpnGold]

@e7alr

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

Male and female biology is just so obviously different.

Nobody is arguing this point.

Im mostly saying, it’s a non issue either way. I say just leave them alone for now. I don’t see a reason to enact a law to ban them from woman’s sports.

THEY AREN’T WOMEN!

Damn!

ITS NOT AN ISSUE!

Damn!

It’s yet another example of Republicans attacking LGBTQ over non issues. These people have been using bathrooms AND playing sports of their identity for as long as those entities existed.

80,000+ HS athletes compete in Iowa. We can assume 50% of them are female. How many trans woman in Iowa have entered a sport and dominated? Or even compete?

I just don’t thing a state law is necessary to restrict. Sends a bad message.

Tell the girls being forced to compete against boys, posing as girls, that it isn’t a problem.

Who is competing with trans women? Where in Iowa?

Y’all are claiming they are “dominating” other women… bring evidence that it is as widespread as y’all claim.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

I just don’t thing a state law is necessary to restrict.

Obviously it is.

As a liberal, I am surprised that you support a state law for this.

Just kidding…

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

I just don’t thing a state law is necessary to restrict.

Obviously it is.

As a liberal, I am surprised that you support a state law for this.

Just kidding…

I don’t. I also don’t support state laws forcing acceptance of them.

[e7alr]

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

Male and female biology is just so obviously different.

Nobody is arguing this point.

Im mostly saying, it’s a non issue either way. I say just leave them alone for now. I don’t see a reason to enact a law to ban them from woman’s sports.

THEY AREN’T WOMEN!

Damn!

ITS NOT AN ISSUE!

Damn!

It’s yet another example of Republicans attacking LGBTQ over non issues. These people have been using bathrooms AND playing sports of their identity for as long as those entities existed.

80,000+ HS athletes compete in Iowa. We can assume 50% of them are female. How many trans woman in Iowa have entered a sport and dominated? Or even compete?

I just don’t thing a state law is necessary to restrict. Sends a bad message.

Tell the girls being forced to compete against boys, posing as girls, that it isn’t a problem.

Who is competing with trans women? Where in Iowa?

Y’all are claiming they are “dominating” other women… bring evidence that it is as widespread as y’all claim.

It appears to be time for the two ducks and intentionally spilled food again.

[WuWei]

[PurpnGold]

@e7alr

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

@PurpnGold

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

Male and female biology is just so obviously different.

Nobody is arguing this point.

Im mostly saying, it’s a non issue either way. I say just leave them alone for now. I don’t see a reason to enact a law to ban them from woman’s sports.

THEY AREN’T WOMEN!

Damn!

ITS NOT AN ISSUE!

Damn!

It’s yet another example of Republicans attacking LGBTQ over non issues. These people have been using bathrooms AND playing sports of their identity for as long as those entities existed.

80,000+ HS athletes compete in Iowa. We can assume 50% of them are female. How many trans woman in Iowa have entered a sport and dominated? Or even compete?

I just don’t thing a state law is necessary to restrict. Sends a bad message.

Tell the girls being forced to compete against boys, posing as girls, that it isn’t a problem.

Who is competing with trans women? Where in Iowa?

Y’all are claiming they are “dominating” other women… bring evidence that it is as widespread as y’all claim.

It appears to be time for the two ducks and intentionally spilled food again.

I’ll wait for your evidence of “domination” in Iowa.

Thanks

[WuWei]

If it’s not an issue, why is the law an issue?

[e7alr]

In typical liberal fashion you don’t know how to recognize when your attempt to argue has fallen on deaf ears. This stupidity is being nipped in the bud.

Go ahead and flail around some more, make some haughty statements, then feel free to go pout about how conservatives ignore you.

[PurpnGold]

It unnecessarily targets trans students at a state level, for no real reason at all.

There is no “domination” happening in Iowa. Their may be a handful of trans women who want to compete. MAYBE.

Yall are telling me this is a problem, but when I ask for evidence of the problem… you pull out a highly misused gaslighting meme.

I’m not the one gaslighting here… y’all made the claim. Back it up.

[PurpnGold]

@e7alr

In typical liberal fashion you don’t know how to recognize when your attempt to argue has fallen on deaf ears. This stupidity is being nipped in the bud.

Go ahead and flail around some more, make some haughty statements, then feel free to go pout about how conservatives ignore you.

3 replies without evidence of “domination”.

I’ll settle for a number of trans women trying to compete. Is it 1, 100, 1000?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

It unnecessarily targets trans students at a state level, for no real reason at all.

No it doesn’t, but so what, it’s not an issue.

@PurpnGold

There is no “domination” happening in Iowa. Their may be a handful of trans women who want to compete. MAYBE.

Then the law isn’t a problem.

@PurpnGold

Yall are telling me this is a problem, but when I ask for evidence of the problem… you pull out a highly misused gaslighting meme.

There’s no misuse. You’re doing it right now.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

In typical liberal fashion you don’t know how to recognize when your attempt to argue has fallen on deaf ears. This stupidity is being nipped in the bud.

Go ahead and flail around some more, make some haughty statements, then feel free to go pout about how conservatives ignore you.

3 replies without evidence of “domination”.

I’ll settle for a number of trans women trying to compete. Is it 1, 100, 1000?

One. And that is enough

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

It unnecessarily targets trans students at a state level, for no real reason at all.

No it doesn’t, but so what, it’s not an issue.

Issue enough for a state law… apparently

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

There is no “domination” happening in Iowa. Their may be a handful of trans women who want to compete. MAYBE.

Then the law isn’t a problem.

Then why not leave them alone?

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Yall are telling me this is a problem, but when I ask for evidence of the problem… you pull out a highly misused gaslighting meme.

There’s no misuse. You’re doing it right now.

It’s a gaslighting meme…. Who is gaslighting here? Apparently you don’t know the definition.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

@e7alr

In typical liberal fashion you don’t know how to recognize when your attempt to argue has fallen on deaf ears. This stupidity is being nipped in the bud.

Go ahead and flail around some more, make some haughty statements, then feel free to go pout about how conservatives ignore you.

3 replies without evidence of “domination”.

I’ll settle for a number of trans women trying to compete. Is it 1, 100, 1000?

One. And that is enough

One is dominating? Who?

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

Issue enough for a state law… apparently

To impact… nobody?

@PurpnGold

Then why not leave them alone?

Are they leaving the females alone?

@PurpnGold

It’s a gaslighting meme…. Who is gaslighting here? Apparently you don’t know the definition.

You are.

[WuWei]

@PurpnGold

One is dominating? Who?

You pick.

[e7alr]

Save your breath, we refuse the concept at any level. We reject it.

[PurpnGold]

@WuWei

@PurpnGold

Issue enough for a state law… apparently

To impact… nobody?

Don’t know. Still waiting for evidence…

But it would be on brand for republicans to pick something that is essentially no existent and create state and federal laws around it. Using hyperbolic statements to drive their base to cheer on laws that do nothing.

Republicans: Election Fraud - “Massive fraud” “Stolen Election”
Libs: Where’s the evidence of massive voter fraud?
Republicans: Arrrrgh Duck Meme

Replace election fraud with

Transgender in Bathrooms
CRT in K-12
Transgender in sports
Social media censorship

“Massive, Widespread, Dominating!!!1!!”

Show me?