Even if the claim was true it basically amounts to arguing that we had no right to know in the first place.
Are you saying you think Trump called the guy up and asked him to change the rules? Or had someone else ask him to change the rules?
Why am I remembering the outrage about how we found out about the DNC shenanigans with Hildawg burning The Bern, the debate questions, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
1 Like
There has to be a “Deep State” for it to make sense.
My bet is that it is run by Emmanuel Goldstein
1 Like
Eat your peas
Here’s the form from May 2018. Page 5. Part 2, Question 1 [1]:
- I know about the information I am disclosing here based on (check all that apply):
I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved
Other employees have told me about eventsor records involved
Other source(s) (please explain)
The form has never disallowed second-hand sources.
The IC IG is required to corroborate those second-hand sources. Which he did.
9 Likes
We need to find the author who made these changes and arrest for treason.
Are you saying that Trump doesn’t know what is going on in his own administration or that just Trump hires only the best and then is not responsible for what they do?
.
.
.
.^^^^
Fake news.
Oops. Pesky facts
3 Likes
No, trump is a helpless fool who exists at the mercy of those he…hires.
Let’s make sure the OP doesn’t skip this.
1 Like
The Liar in Chief? Never!
You’ve already forgotten last weeks dem media criticism of Trump releasing the transcript…
Transcripts between leader are classified… Bush would not have released them in my opinion. He would have just laid down taken it from the dems and media…
I think dems were counting on Trump not releasing the transcript because it was classified. .
1 Like
Old man yells at cloud.
1 Like
No transcript has been released. Keep flailing.
2 Likes
Thoughts?
I like your dates. Except you didn’t read the first line of the article.
"Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. "
So what did the form say in Jan 2018? You were fake news’ed again…!
You don’t understand English. They are making the claim that the May 2018 version was the one that changed:
Markings on the previous version of the Disclosure of Urgent Concern form show that it was formally approved on May 24, 2018. Here is that original Disclosure of Urgent Concern form prior to the August 2019 revision:
There was no intermediate form on Jan 2019. They are saying the disclosure changed. Which shows that they don’t understand English. It’s a requirement of the IG, not the WB. The IC IG must corroborate second-hand info.
2 Likes
