In the What the Hell Category

[FlameHeart]

Time to ban bows and arrows.

[FlameHeart]

They are both the same level of disgustingly evil in my book.

[FlameHeart]

Ok Mr. Sharpshooter Marksman…guy.

[FlameHeart]

Rape and murder are both the product of a societal problem that is driven by politics.

[tnt]

@WuWei

Now take out lawful shootings.

Take out negligent discharges and malfunctions.

Take out felon in possession.

I’m not french.

If you think you will get us down to other country’s levels of gun deaths, you are mistaken.

[TheRedComet]

Maybe not, but it presents a more accurate picture.

The majority of “firearm murders” in this country are primarily gangbangers killing other gangbangers.

Maybe that’s the issue that should be fixed first. And in most of those killings, it’s done with handguns. Not rifles.

[Striker840]

@W_and_C

@Ceasar

@W_and_C

@Ceasar

@DisturbedGuy

Let’s pretend guns aren’t more deadly…because bow and arrow.

Let’s pretend that if the right wasn’t armed the left would already have them all in work camps.

OMG

…

I truly believe that. We would have no rights left if we were not armed. Not a threat, just stating fact.

If they wanted you in work camps, you’d be in work camps already. Individual gun owners would be no match for high-tech weaponry and firepower possessed by the state.

You honestly thing the military would stand as a whole to do this?
Wow, you have zero idea, IF this order was to come down one would see MASSIVE numbers of the military to follow said order. The oath states they will follow LAWFUL orders, AND uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. An order to disarm the public goes against both. Plus military is barred from military actions against citizens. Might want to refresh your memory that.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

Now take out lawful shootings.

Take out negligent discharges and malfunctions.

Take out felon in possession.

I’m not french.

If you think you will get us down to other country’s levels of gun deaths, you are mistaken.

Take them out and let’s see.

I don’t live in another country.

[WuWei]

@Striker840

You honestly thing the military would stand as a whole to do this?

Yes. Because soldiers are mindless idiots who joined the military because they couldn’t do anything else.

[tnt]

@WuWei

Take them out and let’s see.

I don’t live in another country.

Why would you take out felon possessions?

[Striker840]

@GWH

@DisturbedGuy

You would lose…put your “left” broad brush down.

Not if he had me backing him up. Point being, how many shooters do you think the left has vs the right? Put your guns down and stop flexing Annie Oakley.

I may be older, can’t do the humps anymore, BUT, I can still hit the target. My oath to defend the Constitution didn’t expire when I got out of the Corps.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

Take them out and let’s see.

I don’t live in another country.

Why would you take out felon possessions?

It’s already illegal.

[tnt]

@WuWei

It’s already illegal.

So is running people over with a truck.

[Striker840]

@biggestal99

Japan is by far the safest country.

Allan

You are free to move, but, Japan is a highly racist society. If you are not Japanese you are inferior and looked down on.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

It’s already illegal.

So is running people over with a truck.

Agreed. Are you advocating for more common sense truck control? Background checks?

[Striker840]

@WuWei

@Striker840

You honestly thing the military would stand as a whole to do this?

Yes. Because soldiers are mindless idiots who joined the military because they couldn’t do anything else.

Not those I talk to, there are more that would leave than stay.

[tnt]

@WuWei

Agreed. Are you advocating for more common sense truck control? Background checks?

I’m advocating for a similar level of attention and licensing to those who want to own a gun, as those who want to operate a car.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

Agreed. Are you advocating for more common sense truck control? Background checks?

I’m advocating for a similar level of attention and licensing to those who want to own a gun, as those who want to operate a car.

Why?
…

[W_and_C]

@Striker840

@W_and_C

@Ceasar

@W_and_C

@Ceasar

@DisturbedGuy

Let’s pretend guns aren’t more deadly…because bow and arrow.

Let’s pretend that if the right wasn’t armed the left would already have them all in work camps.

OMG

…

I truly believe that. We would have no rights left if we were not armed. Not a threat, just stating fact.

If they wanted you in work camps, you’d be in work camps already. Individual gun owners would be no match for high-tech weaponry and firepower possessed by the state.

You honestly thing the military would stand as a whole to do this?
Wow, you have zero idea, IF this order was to come down one would see MASSIVE numbers of the military to follow said order. The oath states they will follow LAWFUL orders, AND uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. An order to disarm the public goes against both. Plus military is barred from military actions against citizens. Might want to refresh your memory that.

So then, zero danger of anyone ending up in a work camp, armed or otherwise.

[biggestal99]

@W_and_C

So then, zero danger of anyone ending up in a work camp, armed or otherwise

Nah all guns owners in the United States will end up in a gulag eventually.

Allan