Impeachment hearing 12-9-2019

Not just demanding an investigation, but also and most importantly, demanding an “announcement” by the Ukraine’s president so it could be weaponized agaainst fat donald’s political opopnent.

Just like Vindman you want to edit in the word “demand.”

Joe’s own little roach got away from him and landed a spot at Burisma.

He had no idea…

:woman_zombie:

Where was the demand?

The Biden conflict of interest was so obvious a demand was not needed.

:zombie:

Ah. OK so just checking- does that mean you are not ok with a president “demanding” or “pressuring” a foreign government to investigate political opponents?

You realize this is actually worse right?
Like if he didnt care about corruption and just wanted the public image to help him during the 2020 election that this is even more criminal.

Lol.i mean come on…

None of those descriptors fit.

The COI was so egregious all that was needed was to point and say what is this?

:zombie:

Some within our state department found that it wasnt enough. I believe kent was one of those. And spoke up about it.

Other found the 8 month Investigation as fine and legit.

But this was told to you and the other 20 threads on this and you ignore it as usual

Ah- so just checking. Your line of defense is that there was no pressure. No demand. That Biden is an overwhelming criminal and it was obvious but only Trump could get Zelensky to look into the matter. But there was no pressure to do it. It just sort of casually came out in conversation?

Do you really think Trump would consider for one moment that the press would help him in any sense?

The press has dropped the unbiased charade for good.

:zombie:

1 Like

Well this was a post

And does that mean you don’t think its ok for a president to “demand” an investigation into a political opponent. You would say that is wrong?

Voker and Sondland’s text messages.

There is no need for a defense.

The allegations are incoherent.

Biden is clearly more corrupt. He put it all on video.

What happened to Schiff? He really should have explained this dog pile of allegory and innuendo.

:zombie:

No its false. Single question…

Why wasnt it leaked that trump was being investigated but Comey came out staying he was reopening hillarys 2 weeks before the election?

See that’s the problem with your statement. It goes against any sane logical argument.

Lets get really clear here. Did you just say its not ok for a president to "demand’ an investigation into political opponents?

Yes. Why do you think he ran the way he ran. He got what a billion in free advertising during the campaign because the media covered him nonstop.

This is boring…try something more challenging

None of that is a demand and Sonderland was not sure of anything as written.

:zombie:

The reason Trump has gotten away with what he has is because of the press.

Again- just trying to see what you believe…

Do you think its not ok for a president to "demand’ an investigation into political opponents?