I agree in theory. Fringe elements of larger groups shouldn’t define the entire group. But you can’t fully absolve yourself of those elements either. It’s gets tricker with political movements when seemingly moderate groups elect polarizing leadership who act as the figurehead.
I could post an example of a Dominion voting machine changing 6,000 votes from Trump…to Biden and it wouldn’t matter? I could post a judge, authorizing a forensic analysis of this machine and the conclusion was that the software was designed to create systematic fraud and it wouldn’t matter…amirite?
What happens if you apply that logic to anyone who attended a BLM protest that later turned violent?
Don Lemon appears to be calling for collective punishment of Trump voters:
“You’re in the crowd who voted for Trump. If you voted for Trump you voted for the person who the Klan supported. You voted for the person who Nazis support. You voted for the person who the alt-right supports. That’s the crowd that you are in. You voted for the person who incited a crowd to go into the capitol and potentially take the lives of lawmakers. Took the lives of police officers. Took the lives of innocent lives who were there on the Capitol that day. You voted on that side,” Lemon said.
Logically a similar statement would apply to Biden voters and BLM supporters as well if recent reports are correct:
The important thing is that it wasn’t forensically investigated by sources that weren’t in charge of the election that got us where we are? They held on tight to all the evidence. Why is that?