How did NATO overthrow Yanukovych?
Where is this notion coming from that it was NATO?
Yanukovych was a forced out of office after the Maidan massacre based on the assumption that his forces were responsible for the killings.
The problem with this assumption is that Reuters debunked the case against the alleged government snipers back in 2014, and evidence points to right-wing Ukrainian nationalist forces allied with the US as the likely source of the attack.
See posts 70 and 71 for details.
1 Like
Reuters did not âdebunkâ the case.
They reported on flaws in the prosecution.
To make the leap that then means that the theory that no one accepts and is akin to a shooter in the grassy knoll is silly.
The right wing sniper theory is not mainstream and is not accepted by serious people.
No one has faced a trial in the eight years since the shootings. There is no evidence that Yanukovych was responsible for shootings, and there has been no interest in western media in finding the real killers.
Yanukovych won the 2010 election by several percentage points. The Euromaidan massacre was effectively a violent coup that removed the elected president, and the most likely suspects are right-wing groups allied with the US.
Can someone explain again how the US is defending democracy in Ukraine?
The Reuters article did not debunk that the police killed a bunch of people.
What it did show was that there were problems with the prosecutionâs case.
The right wing sniper story is something that no one other than the fringe and Russian media accepts.
Also⌠Yanukovich is not longer in power.
The democratically elected Zelensky is.
Clearly someone killed a bunch of people. The study from the University of Ottawa concluded that right-wing groups were responsible.
Can you point to anything that refutes that study?
At this point the Yanukovych-killed-the-protestors narrative is at best an urban legend and at worse it is a blood-soaked lie.
Here is the most comprehensive reconstruction of the event, finished in 2018, that took all of the available video and audio and 3D mapped it in real time.
No evidence of Right Wing Snipers
Point to the specific evidence that Yanukovych was responsible.
That is a weird pivot away from right wing snipers did it.
The guy was getting protested⌠there was deadly crackdown⌠the people protested harder⌠he fled to Russia.
So the question that was asked is pretty silly.
No. If Yanukovych was not responsible, then the massacre of 2014 was a key element in a coup against the elected government of Ukraine.
The evidence against right-wing groups is about who authored the coup, not whether a coup occurred.
There is no proof of right wing snipers.
Yanukovych fled on his own power. When he did flee, they found that he had been stealing the country blind.
Seriously⌠where are all of these ideas coming from?
RT. TASS.
3 Likes
It was funded by us and nato. It wasnât nato directly for sure
2 Likes
his own government removed him and called a new election.
Maybe our own government overthrow Biden and call for new elections.
Thank for admitting that you have found no evidence that Yanukovych was responsible.
Ukraine was and still is extremely corrupt. There are no clean hands in Ukraine.
That includes Hunter and the rest of his ilk.
2 Likes
âFundedâ is a loaded word.
The US has been âFundingâ pro Democracy programs in Ukraine since the early 90âs.
1 Like
Ukraine impeached their President and called a snap election all of that is legal under the law.
Impeach him.
its perfectly legal.
