If NATO membership for Ukraine was a known bright red line for Russia, why did Biden promote it?

There is a process for removal… but not a new election.

There is tons of evidence that it was the Berkut.

Not Right Wing Snipers

Until they elect someone that we don’t like.

A bunch a LARPers tried something similar to that last January. It’s interesting watching them cry during their court hearings and saying they were duped.

1 Like

Sure it was…

show me were they broke the law.

Yep funding and all the connotation that it carries I just don’t think it’s q bad thing that they did and Russia invading over it is nowhere near the same. The attempt to try to equiate what nato funded and an invasion is ridiculous beyond measure. That’s what some posters are clearly trying to do.

1 Like

If you’re going to set up and use my neighbors yard to intimidate/threaten me…I’m in the right to attack first and neutralize your threat.

What if you neighbor is cool with it?

That gives you the right to attack your neighbor?

independent sovereignty is overrated.

1 Like

Doesn’t matter. He shouldn’t allowed his yard to be used to attack his neighbor.

Yes…Yes it does.

That’s westernization. Any shift of Ukraine towards Europe etc etc etc

The invasion is over that. I feel like and i mean feel that an assasination and “staging” an election would have gotten what Putin wanted arguably but that’s not what he wants now.

Now he wants it all

The neighbor nor the neighbor’s friend has not attacked you.

They just aren’t that into you anymore.

You can just decide to attack them?

The constitutional requirement for removal from office was never met:

Although the legislative removal by an impeachment procedure would have lacked the number of votes required by Ukraine’s constitution, the resolution did not follow the impeachment procedure but instead established that Yanukovych “withdrew from his duties in an unconstitutional manner” and cited “circumstances of extreme urgency”, a situation for which there was no stipulation in the then-current Ukrainian constitution.

Yanukovych fled the country based on accusations that he was responsible for the massacre and the parliament declared the office “vacant”.

This would not be the first time that false narratives have been used to achieve regime change that were ratified by election results.

1 Like

It was a revolution. Constituían. You are quoting zerohedge… again

Experts believed that Ukraine should remain neutral…sadly special interest had other plans. They are the ones that should be hold accountable right alone with Putin. In fact I would go even father…they’re more guilty then Putin. Putin is reacting…that much is clear.

Yes, I know you prefer CIA-approved news sources.

If you’re threat…it’s within my right.

I agree that it should remain neutral. I far from an expert.

I just think that even if you are right then he could beaten them at their game. The Russian intelligence services are quite capable. This is something else. Reaching is def one way of putting it